Open twpol opened 11 years ago
twpol
commented
11 years ago | Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Posted by | James Ross (twpol) |
| Date posted | Fri, 05 Apr 2013 16:49:10 GMT |
Just my opinion, but I think this is quite a big job, and includes completely re-doing the particle system, so it might be a stretch to target this at 0.9 (or even 1.0).
twpol
commented
11 years ago | Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Posted by | rdamurphy (rdamurphy) |
| Date posted | Fri, 12 Apr 2013 19:00:17 GMT |
James is correct. Having spent a week in the particle emitter, at this point, I don't think we're able to do such a feat without major rewriting. However, there is a free tool that may do this: http://www.xnaparticles.com/
Take a look, see what you think...
twpol
commented
11 years ago | Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Posted by | David Forrest (dforrest) |
| Date posted | Sat, 08 Jun 2013 20:42:58 GMT |
I am surprised to see that this is given a "low" priority.
twpol
commented
3 years ago | Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Posted by | Cédric GNIEWEK (sharpeserana) |
| Date posted | Sat, 30 Oct 2021 06:51:59 GMT |
Imported from https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165026
In MSTS, steam and diesel locomotive exhaust smoke avoids colliding with overhead objects. For example, when a loco passes under a bridge that has its collision volume properly set in the SD file, the smoke will billow out and around the bridge. In OR, it passes through the bridge deck. Similar effects occur in engine sheds, tunnels, etc.