Open dan-odsc opened 1 year ago
I think a next step is now to make sure the Tools sheet and the survey are aligned, so we're asking about the same things. And checking to see if the descriptions of the purpose of each tool are as clear as can be.
@greggish @devinbalkind
Also posted to the forum
@mrshll and I have reviewed and updated the sheet to bring it in line with recent developments (mainly our work on profiles and Mikes scoping of validation tooling)
What we’ve done:
Thanks,
Dan
Thanks for this.
Let's continue the conversation on the forum: https://forum.openreferral.org/t/lets-talk-about-tooling/370/6
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 7:24 AM Daniel Smith @.***> wrote:
@greggish https://github.com/greggish @devinbalkind https://github.com/devinbalkind
Also posted to the forum https://forum.openreferral.org/t/standing-technical-meetups/454/7
@mrshll https://forum.openreferral.org/u/mrshll and I have reviewed and updated the sheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tszuthH-_xq1vmjOQbUsroGf8R-wScFu6bYhEs9h4eI/edit#gid=910898418 to bring it in line with recent developments (mainly our work on profiles and Mikes scoping of validation tooling)
What we’ve done:
- Created a drop-down status column (hopefully the status’ make sense
- let me know if not).
- Allocated ‘Done’ status’ to all of the profile related tools.
- Allocated a ‘scoping’ status to the tools Mike has scoped out here https://forum.openreferral.org/t/validator-and-dashboard-for-hsds-hsda-3-0-and-beyond/415
- Highlighted the validation tools Mike has scoped (Key at the bottom of the sheet)
- Added a ‘Notes/Comments’ and ‘Questions’ column on the far right to support engagement. I get notified of any changes so will follow-up any activity in those columns.
Thanks,
Dan
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openreferral/Tooling/issues/1#issuecomment-1903896214, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADMPFYBDOODKOFPWLJQBADYPZK6PAVCNFSM6AAAAAA7B7SUGGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSMBTHA4TMMRRGQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
-- Devin Balkind @devinbalkind devinbalkind.com
Update:
Have responses been reviewed? Do we want to the agenda for the upcoming technical meeting?
@greggish @devinbalkind
We have only a handful of responses https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1p5JyyJYg3DVuXZ5KIjW12ZsxGR2zxvvJ2oHdnp8nmX0/edit?resourcekey&usp=forms_web_b&urp=initialLink#gid=1067078495, but we haven't really promoted it yet. So we could review what's there, and talk about what to do to get more input.
Existing mapping to infrom and build from - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tszuthH-_xq1vmjOQbUsroGf8R-wScFu6bYhEs9h4eI/edit#gid=910898418
This could support - Validator - Specification and Provisioning #2 by taking on: