openreferral / specification

The Human Services Data Specification - a data exchange format developed by the Open Referral Initiative
https://openreferral.org
Other
117 stars 49 forks source link

Better indicate required <> optional distinction, and bring back 'recommended' status #189

Closed greggish closed 10 months ago

greggish commented 6 years ago

I'm hearing feedback that people want to better understand which fields are required vs optional in various contexts. This might not be one fix, so much as a set of steps to provide clearer context.

Also, HSDS 1.0 sorted non-required fields into 'recommended' and 'optional' categories, while v1.1 did away with that distinction. We should consider bringing back the 'recommended' designation to indicate common high-value but non-required fields.

robredpath commented 4 years ago

An alternative solution here might be "profiles" - either customised versions of the standard or just super-explicit guidance on which fields are useful in which contexts.

mrshll1001 commented 10 months ago

Closing since we've addressed this in 3.0. We have clearly marked Required fields on the schema reference page, and we also have a robust Profiles mechanism which serves marking other fields as required for other contexts.