Open yeikel opened 1 year ago
Yes, creating such a recipe is definitely possible. The coordinates of the bom could be specified to the recipe, which would download and resolve the bom. Then knowing which dependencies it manages, it would know what version numbers to remove. Would be very handy.
Yes, creating such a recipe is definitely possible. The coordinates of the bom could be specified to the recipe, which would download and resolve the bom. Then knowing which dependencies it manages, it would know what version numbers to remove. Would be very handy.
Thank you for confirming. I created https://github.com/openrewrite/rewrite/issues/2887
This and openrewrite/rewrite#318 could be converted to YAML-only recipes afterwards for convenience
Yes, creating such a recipe is definitely possible. The coordinates of the bom could be specified to the recipe, which would download and resolve the bom. Then knowing which dependencies it manages, it would know what version numbers to remove. Would be very handy.
@sambsnyd Should I create other BOM related recipes as separate issues? To be implemented in the future using YAML-only recipes
For example there are a couple that should be useful:
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-bom
Follow up question: Can we create a generic recipe to replace manual dependencies with a BOM?
There are many BOMS out there, would it be more useful to create dedicated recipes?
Related issue https://github.com/openrewrite/rewrite-testing-frameworks/issues/318