Closed timo-abele closed 2 months ago
Good feedback, thanks! Looking at the recipe these are the current displayName and description. https://github.com/openrewrite/rewrite-static-analysis/blob/6fc920533401e0f9a098fde655bc648d4dfb4087/src/main/java/org/openrewrite/staticanalysis/UseAsBuilder.java#L59-L65
Whereas indeed the test is clearer about the before/after https://github.com/openrewrite/rewrite-static-analysis/blob/6fc920533401e0f9a098fde655bc648d4dfb4087/src/test/java/org/openrewrite/staticanalysis/UseAsBuilderTest.java#L50-L75
We'd previously shown the @DocumentExample
in the description, which could be a way to surface more clearly what a recipe does
Until then, it's probably best to change the name and description to cover what would help prevent confusion. Any suggestions?
I thought there was a recipe that chains AssertJ asserts from separate lines that I could use for inspiration, but I can no longer find it 🫤 -> feature request I would suggest: Class Name: ChainCallsToBuilderMethods Recipe Name: Chain calls to builder methods on separate lines into one chain of builder calls. Recipe Description: When an API has been designed as a builder, join method invocations into one call chain Feel free to adjust, I will not have the time to make a PR for this.
I thought there was a recipe that chains AssertJ asserts from separate lines that I could use for inspiration, but I can no longer find it 🫤
You might have seen this PR previously, that still needs a more detailed review & merge. You can already use if for inspiration though, as from the tests it does seem to work. A thing I haven't been able to fit in so far is very that it does not make any unintended changes, which is why review has taken some time.
feature request I would suggest: Class Name: ChainCallsToBuilderMethods Recipe Name: Chain calls to builder methods on separate lines into one chain of builder calls. Recipe Description: When an API has been designed as a builder, join method invocations into one call chain Feel free to adjust, I will not have the time to make a PR for this.
Those are good suggestions already, thanks! @mike-solomon would you be able to update these descriptions? You might have some additional thoughts on the phrasing to prevent confusion as to how this ends up in the docs.
After looking at the tests, the description makes sense, but initially I was hoping that this recipe could turn (actual lombok) setter calls into a builder call chain, so for:
before:
after:
I think "series of setter calls" is what tripped me up and let me think that a builder would be added where so far no builder had been. I suggest something like "chain builder calls" and, if possible a code snippet.
Are you interested in contributing a fix to OpenRewrite?