Closed ghickman closed 6 months ago
I don't know. One box would seem to make more sense.
Nope, no idea why we did that 🤷
Given no-one can remember why we split them up, I think the pragmatic choice here is to merge them, and set a generic title on the card 👍
edit: ignore below, I'm just flapping, I think I've got a wording that works
--
Merging the current explanatory texts
A user requires access to certain resources to be able to use the Jobs site. The following are missing for this user: [...] If you think this is incorrect, please speak to the IG Team.
and
A user would ideally have access to one or more Projects.
doesn't really fit as the suggested action for the former doesn't really apply to the latter?
We have two info boxes for missing data on the UserDetailWithOAuth page, selectively showing if a user is missing link(s) to a Backend, Org, or Project. One of the boxes handles Orgs and Backends, and its title is incorrectly set to "No projects".
Related to this, I can't remember why we split this into two boxes. @tomodwyer or @lucyb might know?