Closed brianmackenna closed 1 year ago
@alexwalkerepi has also suggested OpenScience framework might be an option
My vote would be OSF because
a) it's not built for clinical trials b) it has big community buy-in and is likely to persist (trials.gov was down during Trump's US govt shutdown) c) it's transparently funded d) it has good integration with git, if needed
We've tidied the protocol and added a table to the protocol describing 3 protocol changes accompanied with reasons why we've deviated from the protocol there. Protocol has been uploaded as part of a Project to the Open Science Framework, doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/SFPBA.
I have just realised that we previously written a prose protocol version for this study as opposed to the analytic code version that is openly shared by default.
As we have virtually completed it we should tidy up and share
Its available in the gdoc. We can share on the repo but we should also consider depositing with an appropriate registry and getting a DOI for future reference (list below from NIHR website - I'm not sure which is best one for this)
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1a8MRjel5qkEtOSf3ljWaI4cUTxoyKD9AfESINFAT8AE/edit#