Closed hjforbes closed 4 years ago
I think if you want a new study for comparison, copy the study_definition.py
file and name it something like study_definition_[addition_name].py
. This output a csv file called input_[addition_name].csv
which you can refer to in your stata. I will let you do this before I review as it will be easier that way.
See NSAIDs repo for example.
@CarolineMorton Okay, thanks. I'll need to repeat do files 1-8 as well. Can I keep all the worm-related files (study def and do files) within a sub-folder in the analysis folder? I'm slightly concerned that I'm creating a lot of do files to check/keep track of/ensure are consistent, and it might get messy. But maybe there's no better way of doing this?
The study_definition.py
files need to remain in the analysis folder and so does the model.do
. All other files can live in sub folders (however you decide) and pathed to in stata.
Apologies for committing the output files again....
Hi @CarolineMorton and @alexwalkercebm
So I've added the worms variable. However, we think we might need to run this analysis on a tweaked study pop, which will require a new study definition. It will be almost identical to the existing analysis, but starting feb 1st 2019.
Wondering what the best way to do this is, without introducing errors! A separate folder perhaps? Any thoughts would be ace
FYI @laurietomlinson