Closed znicholls closed 4 years ago
@rgieseke this is ready to have a first look at (there's a bug somewhere, something for later/tomorrow). Probably start with https://github.com/openscm/openscm-twolayermodel/blob/c84c8a4e2b4c6deab077a9f463486e1cf8589c23/notebooks/impulse-response-equivalence.ipynb then go from there during a reivew?
Minor consistency thing, there are a few variables like
lambda_0
orb_pt_1
with underscores before the number, most others without, maybe unify?
Done
What is the 't' prefix for variables, just for testing?
All green! Should we merge this now?
Yep t for test.
I will wrangle pylint for 20 minutes, then we can merge.
Adds two-layer model and impulse response model. Also includes a notebook which goes through the details of why the two-layer and impulse response models are identical.
CHANGELOG.rst
added (single line such as:(`#XX <https://github.com/openscm/openscm-twolayermodel/pull/XX>`_) Added feature which does something
)For reference: