Closed dowens76 closed 11 years ago
T his interested me, I took a brief look at Holladay and there is a note for אֱנוֹשׁ that says "mostly poetic." Is it possible that the 1/3 of occurrences pointing at 582 are in poetry?
Thank you, Jesse Griffin www.ekfocus.com
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Daniel Owens notifications@github.comwrote:
Currently just over 2/3 of the occurrences of הָאֲנָשִׁים are tagged with the Strongs:376. However, just under a third are tagged with Strongs:582. The former lemma is אִישׁ while the latter is אֱנוֹשׁ. HALOT lists both as having the plural form אֲנָשִׁים (pp. 44 and 71). Need to research this and see whether there is any basis for assigning individual entries to one or the other lemma.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/openscriptures/morphhb/issues/2 .
BDB lists about 42 instances for אֱנוֹשׁ In the WLC Index I have over 200 for 582. So here is a case that should be updated. I attached Enosh.txt, the updated listing from the WLC Index. I marked all the BDB enosh entries with a +. The rest can be changed, if you have an easy way to do it in the CSV.
David
On 7/13/2013 1:08 AM, Daniel Owens wrote:
Currently just over 2/3 of the occurrences of הָאֲנָשִׁים are tagged with the Strongs:376. However, just under a third are tagged with Strongs:582. The former lemma is אִישׁ while the latter is אֱנוֹשׁ. HALOT lists both as having the plural form אֲנָשִׁים (pp. 44 and 71). Need to research this and see whether there is any basis for assigning individual entries to one or the other lemma.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/openscriptures/morphhb/issues/2.
<word strong="582"> <r>Gen.9.20</r> <r>Gen.11.7</r> <r>Gen.13.16</r> <r>Gen.16.3</r> <r>Gen.18.16</r> <r>Gen.19.4</r> <r>Gen.19.4</r> <r>Gen.19.9</r> <r>Gen.23.6</r> <r>Gen.24.32</r> <r>Gen.29.19</r> <r>Gen.29.22</r> <r>Gen.30.15</r> <r>Gen.31.49</r> <r>Gen.32.25</r> <r>Gen.34.14</r> <r>Gen.34.20</r> <r>Gen.37.15</r> <r>Gen.37.15</r> <r>Gen.38.21</r> <r>Gen.38.25</r> <r>Gen.39.2</r> <r>Gen.40.5</r> <r>Gen.40.5</r> <r>Gen.41.12</r> <r>Gen.42.30</r> <r>Gen.43.11</r> <r>Gen.43.16</r> <r>Gen.43.16</r> <r>Gen.44.3</r> <r>Gen.45.22</r> <r>Gen.46.32</r> <r>Gen.46.32</r> <r>Gen.46.34</r> <r>Gen.47.2</r> <r>Gen.47.20</r> <r>Gen.49.28</r> <r>Exod.4.10</r> <r>Exod.4.19</r> <r>Exod.16.20</r> <r>Exod.18.25</r> <r>Exod.21.22</r> <r>Exod.35.22</r> <r>Num.1.17</r> <r>Num.1.44</r> <r>Num.9.6</r> <r>Num.11.24</r> <r>Num.13.2</r> <r>Num.14.22</r> <r>Num.14.37</r> <r>Num.16.2</r> <r>Num.16.2</r> <r>Num.22.9</r> <r>Num.31.21</r> <r>Num.32.14</r> <r>Num.34.19</r> <r>Deut.1.13</r> <r>Deut.1.23</r> <r>Deut.2.16</r> <r>Deut.25.1</r> <r>Deut.32.26</r>+ <r>Josh.2.2</r> <r>Josh.4.2</r> <r>Josh.5.4</r> <r>Josh.6.22</r> <r>Josh.7.5</r> <r>Josh.8.14</r> <r>Josh.8.21</r> <r>Josh.9.14</r> <r>Josh.10.18</r> <r>Josh.10.24</r> <r>Josh.18.8</r> <r>Josh.18.9</r> <r>Judg.8.5</r> <r>Judg.8.14</r> <r>Judg.9.4</r> <r>Judg.9.51</r> <r>Judg.11.3</r> <r>Judg.12.5</r> <r>Judg.16.27</r> <r>Judg.18.14</r> <r>Judg.18.22</r> <r>Judg.19.25</r> <r>Judg.20.12</r> <r>1Sam.2.17</r> <r>1Sam.5.7</r> <r>1Sam.6.19</r> <r>1Sam.7.11</r> <r>1Sam.10.3</r> <r>1Sam.11.5</r> <r>1Sam.11.10</r> <r>1Sam.14.8</r> <r>1Sam.17.19</r> <r>1Sam.17.26</r> <r>1Sam.18.5</r> <r>1Sam.22.6</r> <r>1Sam.24.7</r> <r>1Sam.25.15</r> <r>1Sam.27.8</r> <r>1Sam.28.8</r> <r>1Sam.29.4</r> <r>1Sam.29.11</r> <r>1Sam.31.3</r> <r>2Sam.2.29</r> <r>2Sam.5.21</r> <r>2Sam.10.5</r> <r>2Sam.11.17</r> <r>2Sam.12.1</r> <r>2Sam.17.12</r> <r>2Sam.23.17</r> <r>1Kgs.9.27</r> <r>1Kgs.11.18</r> <r>1Kgs.20.17</r> <r>1Kgs.21.10</r> <r>2Kgs.2.7</r> <r>2Kgs.5.24</r> <r>2Kgs.12.16</r> <r>2Kgs.24.16</r> <r>2Kgs.25.19</r> <r>2Kgs.25.19</r> <r>Isa.5.22</r> <r>Isa.8.1</r>+ <r>Isa.13.7</r>+ <r>Isa.13.12</r>+ <r>Isa.24.6</r>+ <r>Isa.33.8</r>+ <r>Isa.39.3</r> <r>Isa.51.7</r>+ <r>Isa.51.12</r>+ <r>Isa.56.2</r>+ <r>Jer.5.26</r> <r>Jer.19.10</r> <r>Jer.20.10</r>+ <r>Jer.26.17</r> <r>Jer.29.6</r> <r>Jer.39.4</r> <r>Jer.40.8</r> <r>Jer.41.3</r> <r>Jer.43.9</r> <r>Jer.44.19</r> <r>Jer.48.14</r> <r>Jer.52.25</r> <r>Jer.52.25</r> <r>Ezek.9.4</r> <r>Ezek.11.15</r> <r>Ezek.14.1</r> <r>Ezek.14.14</r> <r>Ezek.16.45</r> <r>Ezek.20.1</r> <r>Ezek.22.9</r> <r>Hos.11.9</r> <r>Joel.4.9</r> <r>Obad.1.7</r> <r>Obad.1.7</r> <r>Jonah.1.10</r> <r>Jonah.1.10</r> <r>Jonah.1.13</r> <r>Mic.7.6</r> <r>Zeph.3.4</r> <r>Zech.7.2</r> <r>Ps.8.5</r>+ <r>Ps.9.20</r>+ <r>Ps.9.21</r>+ <r>Ps.10.18</r>+ <r>Ps.55.14</r>+ <r>Ps.55.24</r> <r>Ps.56.2</r>+ <r>Ps.59.3</r> <r>Ps.66.12</r>+ <r>Ps.73.5</r>+ <r>Ps.76.6</r> <r>Ps.90.3</r>+ <r>Ps.103.15</r>+ <r>Ps.104.15</r>+ <r>Ps.104.15</r>+ <r>Ps.119.24</r> <r>Ps.139.19</r> <r>Ps.141.4</r> <r>Ps.144.3</r>+ <r>Prov.28.5</r> <r>Prov.29.10</r> <r>Job.4.17</r>+ <r>Job.5.17</r>+ <r>Job.7.1</r>+ <r>Job.7.17</r>+ <r>Job.9.2</r>+ <r>Job.10.4</r>+ <r>Job.10.5</r>+ <r>Job.13.9</r>+ <r>Job.14.19</r>+ <r>Job.15.14</r>+ <r>Job.25.4</r>+ <r>Job.25.6</r>+ <r>Job.28.4</r>+ <r>Job.28.13</r>+ <r>Job.32.1</r> <r>Job.32.8</r>+ <r>Job.33.12</r>+ <r>Job.33.16</r> <r>Job.33.26</r>+ <r>Job.33.27</r> <r>Job.34.34</r> <r>Job.36.25</r>+ <r>Job.37.24</r> <r>Ruth.4.2</r> <r>Eccl.9.14</r> <r>Dan.10.7</r> <r>Ezra.2.22</r> <r>Ezra.10.1</r> <r>Neh.3.2</r> <r>Neh.4.17</r> <r>Neh.7.26</r> <r>Neh.11.6</r> <r>1Chr.4.22</r> <r>1Chr.5.18</r> <r>1Chr.7.21</r> <r>1Chr.8.40</r> <r>1Chr.11.19</r> <r>1Chr.19.5</r> <r>1Chr.19.5</r> <r>2Chr.8.9</r> <r>2Chr.13.7</r> <r>2Chr.14.10</r>+ <r>2Chr.24.24</r> <r>2Chr.30.11</r> <r>2Chr.34.12</r> </word>
The OSHB files have been updated.
On 7/13/2013 1:08 AM, Daniel Owens wrote:
Currently just over 2/3 of the occurrences of הָאֲנָשִׁים are tagged with the Strongs:376. However, just under a third are tagged with Strongs:582. The former lemma is אִישׁ while the latter is אֱנוֹשׁ. HALOT lists both as having the plural form אֲנָשִׁים (pp. 44 and 71). Need to research this and see whether there is any basis for assigning individual entries to one or the other lemma.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/openscriptures/morphhb/issues/2.
Good, thanks David. I think that was the right way to go, and I could not do it in the CSV files very easily. I searched in the morphology of the Werkgroep Informatica, Vrije Universiteit and the Westminster Hebrew Morphology, and both of them only parse the singular form of אֶנֹושׁ as that lemma. The plural form אֲנָשִׁים is always parsed as אִישׁ, which is Strongs:376. I think we can mark this closed.
Currently just over 2/3 of the occurrences of הָאֲנָשִׁים are tagged with the Strongs:376. However, just under a third are tagged with Strongs:582. The former lemma is אִישׁ while the latter is אֱנוֹשׁ. HALOT lists both as having the plural form אֲנָשִׁים (pp. 44 and 71). Need to research this and see whether there is any basis for assigning individual entries to one or the other lemma.