Open bcc829 opened 1 week ago
Does this belongs in k-nn repo - https://github.com/opensearch-project/k-NN/
cc - @navneet1v
@sandeshkr419 yes this belongs to k-NN.
@bcc829 there are already some github issues created for to exactly solve this problem: https://github.com/opensearch-project/k-NN/issues/1079, https://github.com/opensearch-project/k-NN/issues/1078
Please do a +1 on the issue and also add your use case so that it can be priortized.
cc: @vamshin
@sandeshkr419 do you have permissions to move this to k-NN repo?
I don't have permissions to move, but @prudhvigodithi mentioned in triage meeting that he can move it (probably maintainer's permissions).
@prudhvigodithi Can you please move this to k-NN plugin?
(I'll add back the untriage label so that k-NN group can acknowledge it)
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe
In my index, I have two knn_vector fields with settings.index.knn set to true, but I want one field to use approximate k-NN search while the other only uses exact k-NN. The field not using approximate k-NN is consuming a lot of memory. It would be ideal if I could configure the use of approximate k-NN on a per-field basis.
Describe the solution you'd like
It would be nice if it could be set for each field as shown below.
Related component
Search
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response