Fix ISM Plugin Transitions Conditions struct (#555)

[emtammaru]

Issues Resolved

Closes https://github.com/opensearch-project/opensearch-go/issues/555

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license. For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 67.96%. Comparing base (06a6dc8) to head (a5b3c1b). Report is 28 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #556 +/- ## =========================================== + Coverage 57.29% 67.96% +10.67% =========================================== Files 315 376 +61 Lines 9823 8853 -970 =========================================== + Hits 5628 6017 +389 + Misses 2902 1555 -1347 + Partials 1293 1281 -12 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/opensearch-project/opensearch-go/pull/556/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=opensearch-project) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [integration](https://app.codecov.io/gh/opensearch-project/opensearch-go/pull/556/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=opensearch-project) | `60.39% <ø> (+9.55%)` | :arrow_up: | | [unit](https://app.codecov.io/gh/opensearch-project/opensearch-go/pull/556/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=opensearch-project) | `15.28% <ø> (+2.43%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=opensearch-project#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/opensearch-project/opensearch-go/pull/556?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=opensearch-project) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [plugins/ism/api\_policies.go](https://app.codecov.io/gh/opensearch-project/opensearch-go/pull/556?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=plugins%2Fism%2Fapi_policies.go&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=opensearch-project#diff-cGx1Z2lucy9pc20vYXBpX3BvbGljaWVzLmdv) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | ... and [273 files with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/opensearch-project/opensearch-go/pull/556/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=opensearch-project)

[dblock]

One more reason for #284, maybe @emtammaru you have some thoughts as a first time contributor.

[emtammaru]

Thanks for the quick turnaround on this fix @dblock. Regarding https://github.com/opensearch-project/opensearch-go/issues/284, that would probably be best if all the types could be generated from a single spec :)

[dblock]

Maybe you're interested in helping? :) wink wink

[emtammaru]

Will think about it haha maybe on a rainy day. Has anyone else started on it yet?

[dblock]

Has anyone else started on it yet?

I don't believe so.