Closed DevasiaThomas closed 6 years ago
@DevasiaThomas I totally agree. However thespace_id
field in the previous_values
object has been deprecated and will be removed in a future version of the spec. This will remove this inconsistency and so I don't think there is much else we can do at this time.
@mattmcneeney Yes, I saw that for associated fields as well. I had this cool construct in Java using inheritance and a contains relationship to deal with the json request body for Update. And when things didn't map I was like "duh..." XD. Btw at the moment context's fields aren't defined properly - will it be left platform dependent or will you be defining it in the next version? I would like it if you guys defined it.
You may have seen this, but we have some of the context
fields defined in profile.md. It's platform dependent and subject to change, hence it is in a separate 'spec' for now.
Yeah I saw that. Thanks.
This is with respect to Provisioning and Updating. For eg: in Provisioning its called space_guid but when it comes to Updating for previous values its called space_id. Can we make this uniform please?