codecov[bot]
commented
5 months ago Codecov Report
Attention: Patch coverage is 94.44444% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 64.24%. Comparing base (
df22211) to head (59bdf9c). Report is 2 commits behind head on main.
| Files | Patch % | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| pkg/matcher/annotation_matcher.go | 93.75% | 1 Missing :warning: |
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1659 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 64.12% 64.24% +0.12% ========================================== Files 141 141 Lines 10878 10895 +17 ========================================== + Hits 6975 6999 +24 + Misses 3387 3382 -5 + Partials 516 514 -2 ```:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
chmouel
By changing the log level of some of the logs from Info or Warn to Debug
admin can always configure the debug level to show if they want, https://pipelinesascode.com/docs/install/settings/#logging-configuration
some docs links issues fix as well
Fixes #1658
Changes
Submitter Checklist
[ ] 📝 Please ensure your commit message is clear and informative. For guidance on crafting effective commit messages, refer to the How to write a git commit message guide. We prefer the commit message to be included in the PR body itself rather than a link to an external website (ie: Jira ticket).
[ ] ♽ Before submitting a PR, run make test lint to avoid unnecessary CI processing. For an even more efficient workflow, consider installing pre-commit and running pre-commit install in the root of this repository.
[ ] ✨ We use linters to maintain clean and consistent code. Please ensure you've run make lint before submitting a PR. Some linters offer a --fix mode, which can be executed with the command make fix-linters (ensure markdownlint and golangci-lint tools are installed first).
[ ] 📖 If you're introducing a user-facing feature or changing existing behavior, please ensure it's properly documented.
[ ] 🧪 While 100% coverage isn't a requirement, we encourage unit tests for any code changes where possible.
[ ] 🎁 If feasible, please check if an end-to-end test can be added. See README for more details.
[ ] 🔎 If there's any flakiness in the CI tests, don't necessarily ignore it. It's better to address the issue before merging, or provide a valid reason to bypass it if fixing isn't possible (e.g., token rate limitations).