Closed sosiouxme closed 5 years ago
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: sosiouxme To fully approve this pull request, please assign additional approvers. We suggest the following additional approver: jmontleon
If they are not already assigned, you can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @jmontleon
in a comment when ready.
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
The pull request process is described here
/hold
/retest
The composes got updated today and also a bug in the repo sync was fixed so hopefully all necessary RPM content is now available for building. We're not really building 4.0 any more though so perhaps this should move to master or 4.1 branch? Up to you how best to proceed.
/retest
/retest
prow / cluster weirdness /retest
No package openshift-clients available
@sosiouxme
yeah, noticed that.
@stevekuznetsov sorry I'm not familiar enough with the CI config to know how repos get configured in... any idea why openshift-clients
RPM isn't available to this build? We definitely sync that out in the rhel-server-ose-rpms repo.
alternatively, should we consider just basing the image on ose-cli to get the client?
Base on cli if you want the CLI binary.
@sosiouxme: The following tests failed, say /retest
to rerun them all:
Test name | Commit | Details | Rerun command |
---|---|---|---|
ci/prow/operator-molecule-olm-e2e | c89ac9d0c09c44421d64982545d3d97190d54633 | link | /test operator-molecule-olm-e2e |
ci/prow/operator-lint | 8d4a899046aa2842f7152a60529047291bfa8736 | link | /test operator-lint |
ci/prow/images | 8d4a899046aa2842f7152a60529047291bfa8736 | link | /test images |
ci/prow/operator-molecule-e2e | 8d4a899046aa2842f7152a60529047291bfa8736 | link | /test operator-molecule-e2e |
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.
No package ansible-service-broker-container-scripts available.
Thanks, yum, that would have been nice to know back when openshift-clients
was listed as unavailable.
So. Why aren't the RPMs that OCP builds and syncs to AWS... available for image builds?
@shawn-hurley could the remaining RPMs be omitted in favor of building from source in the container?
@sosiouxme @shawn-hurley do we still need this PR?
@jmrodri obviously not on release-4.0
, will reopen on master when it becomes a priority again.
This needs to be usable from both OKD and OCP. OKD now should have same RPM sources as OCP so this should work.
@jmontleon @stevekuznetsov -- discuss?