Closed jmrodri closed 4 years ago
/retest
Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.
/retest
Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.
/retest
Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.
/retest
Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.
/retest
Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.
/retest
Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.
/retest
Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.
/retest
Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.
/retest
Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.
/retest
Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.
/retest
Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.
/retest
Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.
/retest
Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.
/retest
Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.
/retest
Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.
/retest
Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.
/retest
Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.
/hold
After three days of retesting, this does not look like a flake.
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.
/hold cancel
/bugzilla refresh
@jmrodri: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1765082, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.
/test operator-molecule-olm-e2e
/test operator-molecule-e2e
/test operator-molecule-e2e
/retest
/retest
@jmrodri: The following tests failed, say /retest
to rerun all failed tests:
Test name | Commit | Details | Rerun command |
---|---|---|---|
ci/prow/operator-molecule-olm-e2e | 899c37e1f08b5dc5f1248d8ba64c681b0ab45379 | link | /test operator-molecule-olm-e2e |
ci/prow/operator-molecule-e2e | 899c37e1f08b5dc5f1248d8ba64c681b0ab45379 | link | /test operator-molecule-e2e |
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.
@jmrodri looks like we're starting to get bit by the python2 deprecation. Looks like more-itertools
dropped python2 support recently: https://github.com/erikrose/more-itertools/issues/355#issuecomment-565474007
which is why the build is failing with a syntax error on pip install
: https://prow.svc.ci.openshift.org/view/gcs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_ansible-service-broker/1253/pull-ci-openshift-ansible-service-broker-release-4.2-operator-molecule-e2e/94#1:build-log.txt%3A309
We can pin the more-itertools version to 5.0.0 and that should get us past it for now
Closed won't fix
/retest
Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.