openshift / cluster-api-provider-libvirt

Apache License 2.0
36 stars 56 forks source link

[release-4.4] BUG 1859306: fix memory leak that leads to unresponsive libvirt URI #204

Closed openshift-cherrypick-robot closed 4 years ago

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented 4 years ago

This is an automated cherry-pick of #199

/assign sdodson

openshift-ci-robot commented 4 years ago

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 1855288 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 1859306. Retitling PR to link against new bug. /retitle [release-4.4] BUG 1859306: fix memory leak that leads to unresponsive libvirt URI

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-libvirt/pull/204): >[release-4.4] BUG 1855288: fix memory leak that leads to unresponsive libvirt URI Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
openshift-ci-robot commented 4 years ago

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1859306, which is invalid:

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-libvirt/pull/204): >[release-4.4] BUG 1859306: fix memory leak that leads to unresponsive libvirt URI Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
dbenoit17 commented 4 years ago

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot commented 4 years ago

@dbenoit17: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1859306, which is invalid:

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-libvirt/pull/204#issuecomment-661976065): >/bugzilla refresh Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
sdodson commented 4 years ago

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot commented 4 years ago

@sdodson: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1859306, which is invalid:

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-libvirt/pull/204#issuecomment-662458279): >/bugzilla refresh Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
dbenoit17 commented 4 years ago

/retest

dbenoit17 commented 4 years ago

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot commented 4 years ago

@dbenoit17: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1859306, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug * bug is open, matching expected state (open) * bug target release (4.4.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.4.z) * bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST) * dependent bug [Bugzilla bug 1857759](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857759) is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA)) * dependent [Bugzilla bug 1857759](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857759) targets the "4.5.z" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.5.0, 4.5.z * bug has dependents
In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-libvirt/pull/204#issuecomment-662534523): >/bugzilla refresh Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
praveenkumar commented 4 years ago

/lgtm /approve

openshift-ci-robot commented 4 years ago

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: praveenkumar

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[OWNERS](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-libvirt/blob/release-4.4/OWNERS)~~ [praveenkumar] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment
openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 4 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-ci-robot commented 4 years ago

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/actuator-pkg-staleness 1f2e290b7bf1704f0a643b7d095ecd3580fe190d link /test actuator-pkg-staleness

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository. I understand the commands that are listed [here](https://go.k8s.io/bot-commands).
openshift-ci-robot commented 4 years ago

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/cluster-api-provider-libvirt#204. Bugzilla bug 1859306 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-libvirt/pull/204): >[release-4.4] BUG 1859306: fix memory leak that leads to unresponsive libvirt URI Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.