search

openshift / cluster-api-provider-libvirt

Apache License 2.0
36 stars 56 forks source link

Bug 1939259: [release-4.6] Update MAO and set metrics on :8081 address #220

Closed Prashanth684 closed 3 years ago

Prashanth684 commented 3 years ago

same as #218 for 4.6.

openshift-ci-robot commented 3 years ago

@Prashanth684: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-libvirt/pull/220): >[release-4.6] Update MAO and set metrics on :8081 address Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
openshift-ci-robot commented 3 years ago

@Prashanth684: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1939259, which is invalid:

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-libvirt/pull/220): >Bug 1939259: [release-4.6] Update MAO and set metrics on :8081 address Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
praveenkumar commented 3 years ago

/lgtm /approve

openshift-ci-robot commented 3 years ago

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: praveenkumar

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[OWNERS](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-libvirt/blob/release-4.6/OWNERS)~~ [praveenkumar] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment
openshift-bot commented 3 years ago

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot commented 3 years ago

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1939259, which is invalid:

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-libvirt/pull/220#issuecomment-802429076): >/bugzilla refresh > >Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
openshift-bot commented 3 years ago

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot commented 3 years ago

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1939259, which is invalid:

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-libvirt/pull/220#issuecomment-803212443): >/bugzilla refresh > >Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
openshift-bot commented 3 years ago

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot commented 3 years ago

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1939259, which is invalid:

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-libvirt/pull/220#issuecomment-803493351): >/bugzilla refresh > >Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
openshift-bot commented 3 years ago

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot commented 3 years ago

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1939259, which is invalid:

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-libvirt/pull/220#issuecomment-803698029): >/bugzilla refresh > >Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
openshift-bot commented 3 years ago

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot commented 3 years ago

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1939259, which is invalid:

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-libvirt/pull/220#issuecomment-804505476): >/bugzilla refresh > >Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
openshift-bot commented 3 years ago

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot commented 3 years ago

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1939259, which is invalid:

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-libvirt/pull/220#issuecomment-805391721): >/bugzilla refresh > >Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
openshift-bot commented 3 years ago

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot commented 3 years ago

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1939259, which is invalid:

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-libvirt/pull/220#issuecomment-806281515): >/bugzilla refresh > >Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
Prashanth684 commented 3 years ago

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot commented 3 years ago

@Prashanth684: An error was encountered querying GitHub for users with public email (bdonahue@redhat.com) for bug 1939259 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. non-200 OK status code: 403 Forbidden body: "{\n \"documentation_url\": \"https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/rest/overview/resources-in-the-rest-api#abuse-rate-limits\",\n \"message\": \"You have triggered an abuse detection mechanism. Please wait a few minutes before you try again.\"\n}\n"

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-libvirt/pull/220#issuecomment-806862715): >/bugzilla refresh Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
Prashanth684 commented 3 years ago

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot commented 3 years ago

@Prashanth684: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1939259, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug * bug is open, matching expected state (open) * bug target release (4.6.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.z) * bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST) * dependent bug [Bugzilla bug 1938316](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938316) is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE)) * dependent [Bugzilla bug 1938316](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938316) targets the "4.7.z" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.7.0, 4.7.z * bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (bdonahue@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-libvirt/pull/220#issuecomment-807097639): >/bugzilla refresh Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
openshift-bot commented 3 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 3 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 3 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 3 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot commented 3 years ago

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-ci-robot commented 3 years ago

@Prashanth684: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1939259 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-libvirt/pull/220): >Bug 1939259: [release-4.6] Update MAO and set metrics on :8081 address Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.