OCPBUGS-27926: Updating cluster-etcd-operator-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.16

[openshift-bot]

Updating cluster-etcd-operator-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.16 TLDR: Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration; please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request: cluster-etcd-operator.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned, this PR will be closed automatically.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes canonical in product builds.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image). In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
  from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

• In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future. To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
• You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>:. An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #forum-ocp-art coreos slack channel.

[openshift-bot]

Created by job run https://saml.buildvm.hosts.prod.psi.bos.redhat.com:8888/job/scheduled-builds/job/sync-ci-images/91261

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27926, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

* bug is open, matching expected state (open) * bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0) * bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact: /cc @geliu2016

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/1187): >Updating cluster-etcd-operator-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.16 >__TLDR__: >Product builds replace base and builder images as configured. This PR is to ensure >that CI builds use the same base images as the product builds. > >Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity >of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product >perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. jira/valid-bug) to help the >PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is >to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test >to remove this tag and help the PR to merge. > >__Detail__: >This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. >One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This >should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately >reflecting what customers will experience. > >The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment >request: [cluster-etcd-operator.yml](https://github.com/openshift/ocp-build-data/tree/16fcb965e08aba14bb4ea6caaeeaa99fe31141bd/images/cluster-etcd-operator.yml). > >The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being >used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version >of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions >to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang >version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift >architecture team and communicated to the ART team. > >__Roles & Responsibilities__: >- Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing > tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: `@release-artists` > in `#forum-ocp-art` on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be > introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned, > this PR will be closed automatically. >- Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add > any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds > are *already* being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity > of our CI. > >ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image). >In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file: >``` >build_root: > from_repository: true >``` > >__Change behavior of future PRs__: >* In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be > set up automatically. This means that such a PR would *merge without human intervention* (and awareness!) in the future. > To do so, open a PR to set the `auto_label` attribute in the image configuration. [Example](https://github.com/openshift-eng/ocp-build-data/pull/1778) >* You can set a commit prefix, like `UPSTREAM: : `. [An example](https://github.com/openshift-eng/ocp-build-data/blob/6831b59dddc5b63282076d3abe04593ad1945148/images/ose-cluster-api.yml#L11). > >If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to `@release-artists` in the `#forum-ocp-art` coreos slack channel. > Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/command-help?repo=openshift%2Fcluster-etcd-operator). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin](https://github.com/openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin/issues/new) repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27926, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

* bug is open, matching expected state (open) * bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0) * bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact: /cc @geliu2016

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/1187): >Updating cluster-etcd-operator-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.16 >__TLDR__: >Product builds replace base and builder images as configured. This PR is to ensure >that CI builds use the same base images as the product builds. > >Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity >of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product >perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. jira/valid-bug) to help the >PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is >to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test >to remove this tag and help the PR to merge. > >__Detail__: >This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. >One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This >should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately >reflecting what customers will experience. > >The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment >request: [cluster-etcd-operator.yml](https://github.com/openshift/ocp-build-data/tree/cc8beb084e71954ba4b303c4f314bf8c9eac305d/images/cluster-etcd-operator.yml). > >The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being >used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version >of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions >to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang >version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift >architecture team and communicated to the ART team. > >__Roles & Responsibilities__: >- Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing > tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: `@release-artists` > in `#forum-ocp-art` on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be > introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned, > this PR will be closed automatically. >- Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add > any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds > are *already* being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity > of our CI. > >ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image). >In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file: >``` >build_root: > from_repository: true >``` > >__Change behavior of future PRs__: >* In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be > set up automatically. This means that such a PR would *merge without human intervention* (and awareness!) in the future. > To do so, open a PR to set the `auto_label` attribute in the image configuration. [Example](https://github.com/openshift-eng/ocp-build-data/pull/1778) >* You can set a commit prefix, like `UPSTREAM: : `. [An example](https://github.com/openshift-eng/ocp-build-data/blob/6831b59dddc5b63282076d3abe04593ad1945148/images/ose-cluster-api.yml#L11). > >If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to `@release-artists` in the `#forum-ocp-art` coreos slack channel. > Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/command-help?repo=openshift%2Fcluster-etcd-operator). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin](https://github.com/openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin/issues/new) repository.

[geliu2016]

/label qe-approved

[dusk125]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci[bot]]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dusk125, geliu2016, openshift-bot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[OWNERS](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/blob/master/OWNERS)~~ [dusk125] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment

[openshift-ci-robot]

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 1e1970f23b7a588953ad47617108a683ecc4f30f and 2 for PR HEAD 40b957c91194483bec4ed164807eebbbd7ae332d in total

[dusk125]

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-qe-no-capabilities

[openshift-ci[bot]]

@dusk125: Overrode contexts on behalf of dusk125: ci/prow/e2e-gcp-qe-no-capabilities

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/1187#issuecomment-1910722630): >/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-qe-no-capabilities Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27926, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

* bug is open, matching expected state (open) * bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0) * bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact: /cc @geliu2016

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/1187): >Updating cluster-etcd-operator-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.16 >__TLDR__: >Product builds replace base and builder images as configured. This PR is to ensure >that CI builds use the same base images as the product builds. > >Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity >of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product >perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. jira/valid-bug) to help the >PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is >to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test >to remove this tag and help the PR to merge. > >__Detail__: >This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. >One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This >should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately >reflecting what customers will experience. > >The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment >request: [cluster-etcd-operator.yml](https://github.com/openshift/ocp-build-data/tree/c1fd6a3966b4b36c7db8b89d07a415251ba8a47f/images/cluster-etcd-operator.yml). > >The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being >used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version >of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions >to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang >version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift >architecture team and communicated to the ART team. > >__Roles & Responsibilities__: >- Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing > tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: `@release-artists` > in `#forum-ocp-art` on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be > introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned, > this PR will be closed automatically. >- Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add > any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds > are *already* being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity > of our CI. > >ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image). >In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file: >``` >build_root: > from_repository: true >``` > >__Change behavior of future PRs__: >* In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be > set up automatically. This means that such a PR would *merge without human intervention* (and awareness!) in the future. > To do so, open a PR to set the `auto_label` attribute in the image configuration. [Example](https://github.com/openshift-eng/ocp-build-data/pull/1778) >* You can set a commit prefix, like `UPSTREAM: : `. [An example](https://github.com/openshift-eng/ocp-build-data/blob/6831b59dddc5b63282076d3abe04593ad1945148/images/ose-cluster-api.yml#L11). > >If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to `@release-artists` in the `#forum-ocp-art` coreos slack channel. > Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/command-help?repo=openshift%2Fcluster-etcd-operator). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin](https://github.com/openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin/issues/new) repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b93e518df9be49a92365f303bef9c1beeafd0385 and 1 for PR HEAD 40b957c91194483bec4ed164807eebbbd7ae332d in total

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27926, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

* bug is open, matching expected state (open) * bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0) * bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact: /cc @geliu2016

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/1187): >Updating cluster-etcd-operator-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.16 >__TLDR__: >Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI >builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration; >please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes. > >The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request: >[cluster-etcd-operator.yml](https://github.com/openshift/ocp-build-data/tree/71cbace3f2c3807304644c855b3d8f2b54340b86/images/cluster-etcd-operator.yml). > >__Detail__: > >This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI >configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should >be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will >experience. > >Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a >different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations >simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to >consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may >also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable >CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made >canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is >important to align CI configuration as soon as possible. > >PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to >change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be >coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated >first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also >gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most >components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. >Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang >version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and >communicated to the ART team. > >__Roles & Responsibilities__: >- Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing > tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: `@release-artists` > in `#forum-ocp-art` on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be > introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned, > this PR will be closed automatically. >- Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add > any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is > canonical, downstream builds are *already* being built with these changes, and merging this PR > only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides > a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes > canonical in product builds. > >ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image). >In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file: >``` >build_root: > from_repository: true >``` > >__Change behavior of future PRs__: >* In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be > set up automatically. This means that such a PR would *merge without human intervention* (and awareness!) in the future. > To do so, open a PR to set the `auto_label` attribute in the image configuration. [Example](https://github.com/openshift-eng/ocp-build-data/pull/1778) >* You can set a commit prefix, like `UPSTREAM: : `. [An example](https://github.com/openshift-eng/ocp-build-data/blob/6831b59dddc5b63282076d3abe04593ad1945148/images/ose-cluster-api.yml#L11). > >If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to `@release-artists` in the `#forum-ocp-art` coreos slack channel. > Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/command-help?repo=openshift%2Fcluster-etcd-operator). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin](https://github.com/openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin/issues/new) repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b4a6a08ca91766ac9b82f3fa9067bdb9e43b0f57 and 0 for PR HEAD 40b957c91194483bec4ed164807eebbbd7ae332d in total

[openshift-ci[bot]]

@openshift-bot: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/verify-deps	40b957c91194483bec4ed164807eebbbd7ae332d	link	true	/test verify-deps

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository. I understand the commands that are listed [here](https://go.k8s.io/bot-commands).

[openshift-ci-robot]

/hold

Revision 40b957c91194483bec4ed164807eebbbd7ae332d was retested 3 times: holding

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27926, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

* bug is open, matching expected state (open) * bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0) * bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact: /cc @geliu2016

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/1187): >Updating cluster-etcd-operator-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.16 >__TLDR__: >Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI >builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration; >please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes. > >The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request: >[cluster-etcd-operator.yml](https://github.com/openshift/ocp-build-data/tree/a68ac2d64a2e3bcf927ae39410024a4c1140177a/images/cluster-etcd-operator.yml). > >__Detail__: > >This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI >configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should >be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will >experience. > >Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a >different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations >simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to >consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may >also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable >CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made >canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is >important to align CI configuration as soon as possible. > >PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to >change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be >coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated >first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also >gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most >components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. >Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang >version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and >communicated to the ART team. > >__Roles & Responsibilities__: >- Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing > tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: `@release-artists` > in `#forum-ocp-art` on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be > introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned, > this PR will be closed automatically. >- Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add > any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is > canonical, downstream builds are *already* being built with these changes, and merging this PR > only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides > a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes > canonical in product builds. > >ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image). >In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file: >``` >build_root: > from_repository: true >``` > >__Change behavior of future PRs__: >* In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be > set up automatically. This means that such a PR would *merge without human intervention* (and awareness!) in the future. > To do so, open a PR to set the `auto_label` attribute in the image configuration. [Example](https://github.com/openshift-eng/ocp-build-data/pull/1778) >* You can set a commit prefix, like `UPSTREAM: : `. [An example](https://github.com/openshift-eng/ocp-build-data/blob/6831b59dddc5b63282076d3abe04593ad1945148/images/ose-cluster-api.yml#L11). > >If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to `@release-artists` in the `#forum-ocp-art` coreos slack channel. > Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/command-help?repo=openshift%2Fcluster-etcd-operator). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin](https://github.com/openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin/issues/new) repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27926. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/1187): >Updating cluster-etcd-operator-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.16 >__TLDR__: >Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI >builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration; >please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes. > >The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request: >[cluster-etcd-operator.yml](https://github.com/openshift/ocp-build-data/tree/352933fb9bfebcf8e4a1266335503fb596244e0b/images/cluster-etcd-operator.yml). > >__Detail__: > >This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI >configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should >be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will >experience. > >Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a >different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations >simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to >consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may >also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable >CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made >canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is >important to align CI configuration as soon as possible. > >PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to >change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be >coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated >first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also >gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most >components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. >Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang >version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and >communicated to the ART team. > >__Roles & Responsibilities__: >- Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing > tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: `@release-artists` > in `#forum-ocp-art` on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be > introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned, > this PR will be closed automatically. >- Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add > any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is > canonical, downstream builds are *already* being built with these changes, and merging this PR > only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides > a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes > canonical in product builds. > >ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image). >In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file: >``` >build_root: > from_repository: true >``` > >__Change behavior of future PRs__: >* In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be > set up automatically. This means that such a PR would *merge without human intervention* (and awareness!) in the future. > To do so, open a PR to set the `auto_label` attribute in the image configuration. [Example](https://github.com/openshift-eng/ocp-build-data/pull/1778) >* You can set a commit prefix, like `UPSTREAM: : `. [An example](https://github.com/openshift-eng/ocp-build-data/blob/6831b59dddc5b63282076d3abe04593ad1945148/images/ose-cluster-api.yml#L11). > >If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to `@release-artists` in the `#forum-ocp-art` coreos slack channel. > Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/command-help?repo=openshift%2Fcluster-etcd-operator). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin](https://github.com/openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin/issues/new) repository.