Closed ArangoGutierrez closed 2 years ago
@ArangoGutierrez: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2022518, which is invalid:
Comment /bugzilla refresh
to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.
/bugzilla refresh
/bugzilla refresh
@ArangoGutierrez: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2022518, which is invalid:
Comment /bugzilla refresh
to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.
@ArangoGutierrez: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2022518, which is invalid:
Comment /bugzilla refresh
to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: ArangoGutierrez
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
The pull request process is described here
Makes sense to me. The BZ needs some care.
/lgtm
/cc @wabouhamad @lenahorsley
/bugzilla refresh
Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.
@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2022518, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.
Requesting review from QA contact: /cc @wabouhamad
@ArangoGutierrez: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:
Bugzilla bug 2022518 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.
OLM manages the lifecycle of the serviceaccount which is specified in the CSV. If it's added again as a separate manifest it may interfere and cause issues with OLM’s management process (like causing upgrade failures etc). That's the reason it need not be added by the user separately. The suggested action is to remove the service account config yaml file from the operator’s manifest folder.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Eduardo Arango Gutierrez carangog@redhat.com