Closed nimrodshn closed 6 years ago
@simon3z @cben @yaacov please review.
@cben @yaacov, it seems simple enough but could you do a first round of review?
LGTM, and fixes the issue in the BZ.
@simon3z No it isn't required - Thanks! fixed.
PTAL. :it:
@nimrodshn LGTM :+1: to merge if you re-tested and it's fixing the issues.
@simon3z tested. :+1:
LGTM. @simon3z can you do a release? Can we help do a release? What does releasing involve in this repo?
Q: can this be a minor version bump?
manageiq only specifies 2.1
docker tag.
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-kubernetes/pull/234 bumps to 2.4
docker tag, still unmerged because we had no bandwidth to test. we'll test it now.
do we want to fix existing manageiqs by backporting and releasing inspector 2.1.3
?
or backport the manageiq bump to use inspector 2.4
and just release inspector 2.4.1
?
(anyway, let's start from inspector 2.4.1, so we can start the downstream build ball rolling...)
Once you identified which version you intend to build and release please submit the backported PR to the relevant branch. Erez released the last build, do you have anyone in your team left in charge to handle that?
testing now via my docker hub...
Erez released the last build, do you have anyone in your team left in charge to handle that?
nshneor sorry the github name is @nimrodshn. Can you give him github & docker hub permissions?
sorry the github name is @nimrodshn.
nshneor sorry the github name is @nimrodshn. Can you give him github & docker hub permissions?
I can't, openshift org admins can. Check with @pweil-
@nimrodshn you should now be able to tag v2.4.1
What this does?
Adds headers to the CVE file request under
getInputCVE
- Some servers require headers in order to supply a 200 response, in particular our default CVE host -https://www.redhat.com/security/data/metrics/ds/
BZ's: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620376 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620068