OCPBUGS-36233: Replicas hook consider Control plane topology

[dfajmon]

If ControlPlaneTopology is set to HighlyAvailable return pod count 2 else 1.

backporting from #1796

[openshift-ci-robot]

@dfajmon: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36233, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target either version "4.16." or "openshift-4.16.", but it targets "4.18.0" instead
• expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is ON_QA instead
• expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36233 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.17.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/library-go/pull/1810): >If ControlPlaneTopology is set to `HighlyAvailable` return pod count 2 else 1. > >backporting from #1796 Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/command-help?repo=openshift%2Flibrary-go). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin](https://github.com/openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin/issues/new) repository.

[openshift-ci[bot]]

@dfajmon: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes-sigs/prow](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/prow/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository. I understand the commands that are listed [here](https://go.k8s.io/bot-commands).

[RomanBednar]

/lgtm /approve

[openshift-ci[bot]]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dfajmon, RomanBednar Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign jsafrane for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - **[pkg/operator/csi/OWNERS](https://github.com/openshift/library-go/blob/release-4.16/pkg/operator/csi/OWNERS)** Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment

[dfajmon]

/hold discussing if we really need backport for this

[dfajmon]

/close no backport needed

[openshift-ci[bot]]

@dfajmon: Closed this PR.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/library-go/pull/1810#issuecomment-2393821492): >/close >no backport needed Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes-sigs/prow](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/prow/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@dfajmon: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36233. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/library-go/pull/1810): >If ControlPlaneTopology is set to `HighlyAvailable` return pod count 2 else 1. > >backporting from #1796 Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/command-help?repo=openshift%2Flibrary-go). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin](https://github.com/openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin/issues/new) repository.