Closed andfasano closed 2 months ago
@andfasano: This pull request references WRKLDS-1368 which is a valid jira issue.
Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set.
@andfasano: This pull request references WRKLDS-1368 which is a valid jira issue.
Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set.
@andfasano: This pull request references WRKLDS-1368 which is a valid jira issue.
Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set.
/assign @ingvagabund
I've dropped some comments but overall looks good to me. Thank you
/hold
until at least one (preferably both) of the subcommands is/are introduced. We don't wanna merge empty skeletons.
/hold
until at least one (preferably both) of the subcommands is/are introduced. We don't wanna merge empty skeletons.
The work for the create command is currently in progress here https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/1819. The current PR does not link the skeleton commands to oc adm
, so the current code will not be visible
@andfasano: The following tests failed, say /retest
to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required
to rerun all mandatory failed tests:
Test name | Commit | Details | Required | Rerun command |
---|---|---|---|---|
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade | 542cef4a44025ba40d249e11f258115968184eef | link | true | /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade |
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial | 542cef4a44025ba40d249e11f258115968184eef | link | true | /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial |
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.
Re experimental vs GA, we are now in a developer preview in OpenShift 4.16, which can be considered experimental. The feature is expected as a GA after this dev preview, and we aim to support it as such if all goes to plan during this dev cycle. I'd suggest to please remove the "experimental" note in the description to avoid confusion. Many thanks!
/hold until at least one (preferably both) of the subcommands is/are introduced. We don't wanna merge empty skeletons.
The work for the create command is currently in progress here #1819. The current PR does not link the skeleton commands to
oc adm
, so the current code will not be visible
Hi @ingvagabund , the first subcommand PR is now introduced https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/1819, can we proceed with this PR (since it's the base for 1819)? Thanks
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: andfasano, pawanpinjarkar, rwsu Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign soltysh for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Included in https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/1819
This initial PR defines just the initial high level structure for the new add nodes commands (see epic https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WRKLDS-937 for more details), with no flags and no implementation. The main goal of this patch is to converge on the commands code organizations and naming (flags and implementation will followup in subsequent PRs).
Layout will look like: