openshift / ocp-on-arm

Issue tracker for OCP on ARM64 dev preview releases
Apache License 2.0
13 stars 1 forks source link

Single Node OpenShift on ARM #20

Closed kaovilai closed 2 years ago

kaovilai commented 2 years ago

Would love to have this run on raspberry pi 4

yselkowitz commented 2 years ago

Work on Single Node OpenShift is ongoing; currently it can be installed on AWS by adjusting the install-config.yaml to have only one controlPlane node (which then needs to be specified to be at least m6g.2xlarge or larger) and zero worker nodes.

As for the RasPi, only RHEL-compatible machines will be considered for OpenShift enablement, and RHEL for ARM requires ServerReady SR compliance along with device driver support in the upstream kernel. (For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/6673691.) The RasPi fulfills neither condition. Furthermore, while 8 GB memory is usually sufficient for a minimal worker node, it is generally insufficient for a control plane node, particularly in a 3NO or SNO configuration.

However, you may want to try MicroShift as an alternative; https://next.redhat.com/2022/01/19/introducing-microshift/ mentions the RasPi4 as a possible target. Please note that MicroShift is not officially supported, so please do not raise issues here about it.

I hope you find this information helpful.

/close

openshift-ci[bot] commented 2 years ago

@yselkowitz: Closing this issue.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/ocp-on-arm/issues/20#issuecomment-1023951057): >Work on Single Node OpenShift is ongoing; currently it can be installed on AWS by adjusting the `install-config.yaml` to have only one controlPlane node (which then needs to be specified to be at least `m6g.2xlarge` or larger) and zero worker nodes. > >As for the RasPi, only RHEL-compatible machines will be considered for OpenShift enablement, and RHEL for ARM requires ServerReady SR compliance along with device driver support in the upstream kernel. (For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/6673691.) The RasPi fulfills neither condition. Furthermore, while 8 GB memory is usually sufficient for a minimal worker node, it is generally insufficient for a control plane node, particularly in a 3NO or SNO configuration. > >However, you may want to try MicroShift as an alternative; https://next.redhat.com/2022/01/19/introducing-microshift/ mentions the RasPi4 as a possible target. Please note that MicroShift is not officially supported, so please do not raise issues here about it. > >I hope you find this information helpful. > >/close Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
kaovilai commented 2 years ago

Well isn't it an ongoing issue? Or are you tracking elsewhere as well?

yselkowitz commented 2 years ago

The 4.9 developer preview is only targeting AWS, and you can try SNO on AWS right now as described above. Other platforms are out of scope for this issue tracker.

LorbusChris commented 2 years ago

Side note: Using this firmware for the RPi, one can actually make it sufficiently SBBR-compliant for deployment of Fedora CoreOS (and probably RHEL CoreOS too): https://github.com/pftf/RPi4 Obviously that requires the creation of a custom boot image. And there's still the issue of insufficient memory for OpenShift masters.