search

openshift / ocp-release-operator-sdk

Apache License 2.0
16 stars 38 forks source link

Bug 2058044: use ubi instead of busybox for untar image #221

Closed jmrodri closed 2 years ago

jmrodri commented 2 years ago

Description of the change: Switch to using UBI instead of busybox for the untar image.

Motivation for the change: With the docker rate limiting in place, busybox is not a great choice for the untar image. Therefore, switching to UBI to avoid that limit.

openshift-ci[bot] commented 2 years ago

@jmrodri: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2058044, which is invalid:

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/ocp-release-operator-sdk/pull/221): >Bug 2058044: use ubi instead of busybox for untar image Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
jmrodri commented 2 years ago

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci[bot] commented 2 years ago

@jmrodri: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2058044, which is invalid:

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/ocp-release-operator-sdk/pull/221#issuecomment-1068353001): >/bugzilla refresh Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
jmrodri commented 2 years ago

/test e2e-aws-ansible

jmrodri commented 2 years ago

/test e2e-aws-helm

jmrodri commented 2 years ago

/test e2e-aws-helm

jmrodri commented 2 years ago

/test e2e-aws-ansible

jmrodri commented 2 years ago

/test e2e-aws-ansible

jmrodri commented 2 years ago

/test e2e-aws-helm

michaelryanpeter commented 2 years ago

/label docs-approved

jmrodri commented 2 years ago

/label backport-risk-assessed

openshift-ci[bot] commented 2 years ago

@jmrodri: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository. I understand the commands that are listed [here](https://go.k8s.io/bot-commands).
emmajiafan commented 2 years ago

/label cherry-pick-approved

jmrodri commented 2 years ago

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci[bot] commented 2 years ago

@jmrodri: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2058044, which is invalid:

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/ocp-release-operator-sdk/pull/221#issuecomment-1096981849): >/bugzilla refresh Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
openshift-ci[bot] commented 2 years ago

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: asmacdo, jmrodri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[OWNERS](https://github.com/openshift/ocp-release-operator-sdk/blob/release-4.8/OWNERS)~~ [asmacdo,jmrodri] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment
openshift-bot commented 2 years ago

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci[bot] commented 2 years ago

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2058044, which is invalid:

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/ocp-release-operator-sdk/pull/221#issuecomment-1097442793): >/bugzilla refresh > >Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
Xia-Zhao-rh commented 2 years ago

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci[bot] commented 2 years ago

@Xia-Zhao-rh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2058044, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug * bug is open, matching expected state (open) * bug target release (4.8.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.8.z) * bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST) * dependent bug [Bugzilla bug 2064408](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064408) is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE)) * dependent [Bugzilla bug 2064408](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064408) targets the "4.9.z" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.9.0, 4.9.z * bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (xzha@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/ocp-release-operator-sdk/pull/221#issuecomment-1097992570): >/bugzilla refresh Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
openshift-ci[bot] commented 2 years ago

@jmrodri: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2058044 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/ocp-release-operator-sdk/pull/221): >Bug 2058044: use ubi instead of busybox for untar image Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.