search

openshift / openshift-docs

OpenShift 3 and 4 product and community documentation
https://docs.openshift.com
Apache License 2.0
748 stars 1.74k forks source link

[enterprise-4.14]TELCODOCS-1916: Moving under scalability and performance section #78427

Closed rohennes closed 2 months ago

rohennes commented 3 months ago

TELCODOCS-1916: This content was added as a top level assembly. However, it should be in the scalability and performance assembly. No content changes - just moving the files and adjusting xref paths accordingly.

Version(s): 4.14

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/TELCODOCS-1916

Link to docs preview: https://78427--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/telco_ref_design_specs/telco-ref-design-specs-overview

Additional information: QE not required, just moving content as it was in the wrong place. This content is not in 4.16 or later yet, but it is published in 4.15 and 4.14, so that is why I am targeting the release branch. This is the 4.15 PR: #78459

openshift-ci-robot commented 3 months ago

@rohennes: This pull request references TELCODOCS-1916 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/78427): > > > > >Version(s): > > >Issue: > > >Link to docs preview: > > >QE review: >- [ ] QE has approved this change. > > >Additional information: > > > > Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/command-help?repo=openshift%2Fopenshift-docs). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin](https://github.com/openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin/issues/new) repository.
ocpdocs-previewbot commented 3 months ago

🤖 Thu Jul 04 13:01:18 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://78427--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/telco_ref_design_specs/core/telco-core-rds-overview.html https://78427--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/telco_ref_design_specs/core/telco-core-rds-use-cases.html https://78427--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/telco_ref_design_specs/core/telco-core-ref-crs.html https://78427--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/telco_ref_design_specs/core/telco-core-ref-design-components.html https://78427--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/telco_ref_design_specs/ran/telco-ran-du-overview.html https://78427--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/telco_ref_design_specs/ran/telco-ran-ref-design-spec.html https://78427--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/telco_ref_design_specs/ran/telco-ran-ref-du-components.html https://78427--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/telco_ref_design_specs/ran/telco-ran-ref-du-crs.html https://78427--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/telco_ref_design_specs/ran/telco-ran-ref-software-artifacts.html https://78427--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/telco_ref_design_specs/telco-ref-design-specs-overview.html

openshift-ci-robot commented 3 months ago

@rohennes: No Jira issue with key 14TELCODOCS-1916 exists in the tracker at https://issues.redhat.com/. Once a valid jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request, request a refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/78427): > > > > >Version(s): > > >Issue: > > >Link to docs preview: > > >QE review: >- [ ] QE has approved this change. > > >Additional information: > > > > Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/command-help?repo=openshift%2Fopenshift-docs). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin](https://github.com/openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin/issues/new) repository.
openshift-ci-robot commented 3 months ago

@rohennes: This pull request references TELCODOCS-1916 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/78427): > > > > >Version(s): > > >Issue: > > >Link to docs preview: > > >QE review: >- [ ] QE has approved this change. > > >Additional information: > > > > Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/command-help?repo=openshift%2Fopenshift-docs). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin](https://github.com/openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin/issues/new) repository.
rohennes commented 3 months ago

/retest

openshift-ci-robot commented 3 months ago

@rohennes: This pull request references TELCODOCS-1916 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/78427): >[TELCODOCS-1916](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/TELCODOCS-1916): This content was added as a top level assembly. However, it should be in the scalability and performance assembly. No content changes - just moving the files. > >Version(s): >4.14. > >Issue: >https://issues.redhat.com/browse/TELCODOCS-1916 > >Link to docs preview: >https://78427--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/telco_ref_design_specs/telco-ref-design-specs-overview > >Additional information: >QE not required, just moving content as it was in the wrong place. This content is not in 4.16 or later yet. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/command-help?repo=openshift%2Fopenshift-docs). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin](https://github.com/openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin/issues/new) repository.
openshift-ci-robot commented 3 months ago

@rohennes: This pull request references TELCODOCS-1916 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/78427): >[TELCODOCS-1916](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/TELCODOCS-1916): This content was added as a top level assembly. However, it should be in the scalability and performance assembly. No content changes - just moving the files. > >Version(s): >4.14. > >Issue: >https://issues.redhat.com/browse/TELCODOCS-1916 > >Link to docs preview: >https://78427--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/telco_ref_design_specs/telco-ref-design-specs-overview > >Additional information: >QE not required, just moving content as it was in the wrong place. This content is not in 4.16 or later yet, but it is published in 4.15 and 4.14, so that is why I am targeting the release branch. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/command-help?repo=openshift%2Fopenshift-docs). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin](https://github.com/openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin/issues/new) repository.
openshift-ci-robot commented 3 months ago

@rohennes: This pull request references TELCODOCS-1916 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/78427): >[TELCODOCS-1916](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/TELCODOCS-1916): This content was added as a top level assembly. However, it should be in the scalability and performance assembly. No content changes - just moving the files. > >Version(s): >4.14 > >Issue: >https://issues.redhat.com/browse/TELCODOCS-1916 > >Link to docs preview: >https://78427--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/telco_ref_design_specs/telco-ref-design-specs-overview > >Additional information: >QE not required, just moving content as it was in the wrong place. This content is not in 4.16 or later yet, but it is published in 4.15 and 4.14, so that is why I am targeting the release branch. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/command-help?repo=openshift%2Fopenshift-docs). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin](https://github.com/openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin/issues/new) repository.
rohennes commented 3 months ago

/label peer-review-needed /label telco

openshift-ci-robot commented 3 months ago

@rohennes: This pull request references TELCODOCS-1916 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/78427): >[TELCODOCS-1916](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/TELCODOCS-1916): This content was added as a top level assembly. However, it should be in the scalability and performance assembly. No content changes - just moving the files and adjusting xref paths accordingly. > >Version(s): >4.14 > >Issue: >https://issues.redhat.com/browse/TELCODOCS-1916 > >Link to docs preview: >https://78427--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/telco_ref_design_specs/telco-ref-design-specs-overview > >Additional information: >QE not required, just moving content as it was in the wrong place. This content is not in 4.16 or later yet, but it is published in 4.15 and 4.14, so that is why I am targeting the release branch. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/command-help?repo=openshift%2Fopenshift-docs). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin](https://github.com/openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin/issues/new) repository.
openshift-ci-robot commented 3 months ago

@rohennes: This pull request references TELCODOCS-1916 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/78427): >[TELCODOCS-1916](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/TELCODOCS-1916): This content was added as a top level assembly. However, it should be in the scalability and performance assembly. No content changes - just moving the files and adjusting xref paths accordingly. > >Version(s): >4.14 > >Issue: >https://issues.redhat.com/browse/TELCODOCS-1916 > >Link to docs preview: >https://78427--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/telco_ref_design_specs/telco-ref-design-specs-overview > >Additional information: >QE not required, just moving content as it was in the wrong place. This content is not in 4.16 or later yet, but it is published in 4.15 and 4.14, so that is why I am targeting the release branch. This is the 4.15 PR: #78459 Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/command-help?repo=openshift%2Fopenshift-docs). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin](https://github.com/openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin/issues/new) repository.
kcarmichael08 commented 3 months ago

Screenshot 2024-07-03 at 6 47 47 PM

openshift-ci[bot] commented 3 months ago

@rohennes: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes-sigs/prow](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/prow/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository. I understand the commands that are listed [here](https://go.k8s.io/bot-commands).
rohennes commented 3 months ago

Fixed the links. Redirects are not needed for this move because this section was only published on July 2 so the traffic would be very low, if any.

rohennes commented 3 months ago

/label merge-review-needed