[release-3.11] Bug 1887306: UPSTREAM: 94712: [credentialprovider] avoid potential secret leaking while reading .dockercfg

soltysh commented 3 years ago

/assign @sttts

openshift-ci-robot commented 3 years ago

@soltysh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1887305, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "3.11.z" release, but it targets "---" instead
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is VERIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/25696): >[release-3.11] Bug 1887305: UPSTREAM: 94712: [credentialprovider] avoid potential secret leaking while reading .dockercfg Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.

openshift-ci-robot commented 3 years ago

@soltysh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1887306, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

* bug is open, matching expected state (open) * bug target release (3.11.z) matches configured target release for branch (3.11.z) * bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to [this](https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/25696): >[release-3.11] Bug 1887306: UPSTREAM: 94712: [credentialprovider] avoid potential secret leaking while reading .dockercfg Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.

soltysh commented 3 years ago

/assign @mfojtik for approval

sttts commented 3 years ago

/lgtm /approve

soltysh commented 3 years ago

/retest

soltysh commented 3 years ago

/retest

soltysh commented 3 years ago

/retest

openshift-merge-robot commented 3 years ago

@soltysh: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Rerun command
ci/openshift-jenkins/extended_conformance_install	8116439a9bbad19dfaa889bbc57012603b703088	link	`/test extended_conformance_install`
ci/openshift-jenkins/cmd	8116439a9bbad19dfaa889bbc57012603b703088	link	`/test cmd`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository. I understand the commands that are listed [here](https://go.k8s.io/bot-commands).

sttts commented 3 years ago

/retest

sttts commented 3 years ago

/approve

mfojtik commented 3 years ago

/lgtm

openshift-ci-robot commented 3 years ago

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mfojtik, soltysh, sttts

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[OWNERS](https://github.com/openshift/origin/blob/release-3.11/OWNERS)~~ [mfojtik] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment