Open chrisdembia opened 6 years ago
Do you already have plans for that?
It's not an immediate priority, but I definitely want to do it.
I haven't read that paper; thanks for linking it. Yes, with the trapezoidal method, we'd only be able to do h mesh refinement.
I've implemented a very basic mesh refinement scheme (from Betts' book) on a toy problem, and it wasn't so bad. I think a simple scheme would work fine for most purposes.
Do you already have plans for that? I am interested to know more about mesh refinement. I have read some stuff about how GPOPS deals with that (hp mesh refinement scheme, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7061603/ p51(16)). I think the number of collocation points is fixed using trapezoidal methods so that would be only a h mesh refinement scheme in muscollo I guess (to follow their terminology).