I hadn’t tried SRTM 90 lately. For a small area (Chaco Canyon NHP, attached) I get a timeout on visualize and an error on analyze. However if I ask for only a single year (from 1000 to 1000) on PMDI or Paleocar I get reasonable behavior--the graph shows at dot at that year (x) and the mean (y) and the statistics show.
This is a bug. We need to do something to not generate errors.
It may be that we can just assign a year to the SRTM90 dataset and it will no longer be a special case, but perhaps that causes other problems. If we have to treat it separately, on Visualize just show a map with no graph or a graph with a dot at the mean for that year and for Analyze show the numerical statistics with no graph or again, a graph with a dot at the mean for that year
I hadn’t tried SRTM 90 lately. For a small area (Chaco Canyon NHP, attached) I get a timeout on visualize and an error on analyze. However if I ask for only a single year (from 1000 to 1000) on PMDI or Paleocar I get reasonable behavior--the graph shows at dot at that year (x) and the mean (y) and the statistics show.
This is a bug. We need to do something to not generate errors.
It may be that we can just assign a year to the SRTM90 dataset and it will no longer be a special case, but perhaps that causes other problems. If we have to treat it separately, on Visualize just show a map with no graph or a graph with a dot at the mean for that year and for Analyze show the numerical statistics with no graph or again, a graph with a dot at the mean for that year