[For discussion] New issues to address as a result of offline schedules and editing birth reg

[cafootitt]

From @paulnindi "if an older child say 6 weeks comes in first contact with facility; assuming that the nurse will give opv1 and leave out OPV0 because it has passed 13 days ,the effect this has On the home page, is that vaccines status will still be showing ''record at birth'' even when the child is due for other vaccines. Perhaps an option to say OPV 0 was not given is needed."

"One other thing am not sure of is how the system is treating the overdue status since effecting the back entry functionality. For older children, despite the period the color code for vaccines due is blue only."

"Registration: Concern coming up is on editing. Some fields such as Sex, Date first seen, Child's DOB, Birth weight, Place of birth, have been defined not to be editable fields as to data dictionary. Field observations suggest some nurses sometimes do make mistakes on some fields and usually would require editing. I would like to suggest having these fields editable at-least within the day and can be locked out."

Recording a child who is 6 months activates Vitamin A IFC2 which is a dose for period 0 - 5 months. The system should activate Vitamin A 1 since its 6 months (However posses a challenge on back entry i.e it will mean that Vitamin A IFC2 cannot be back entered if it was given earlier. (This might need discussion.)

[faith-mutua]

This issue was moved to OpenSRP/opensrp-client-path#34