Revise testing policy with labels

[hlandau]

First draft. Let me know your thoughts. I've tried to avoid overengineering this for now.

[hlandau]

Updated.

[hlandau]

It's been 18 days, so I'm now raising the vote on this. cc @openssl/otc

topic: Approve the proposed test labelling policy (technical-policies#57)
Proposed by Hugo Landau
Public: yes
opened: 2022-11-07
closed: 
accepted:  yes/no  (for: X, against: Y, abstained: Z, not voted: T)

  Dmitry     [  ]
  Matt       [  ]
  Pauli      [  ]
  Tim        [  ]
  Hugo       [+1]
  Richard    [  ]
  Shane      [  ]
  Tomas      [  ]
  Kurt       [  ]
  Matthias   [  ]
  Nicola     [  ]

[t8m]

Vote: [+1]

[t-j-h]

Vote [0]

[mattcaswell]

Vote: [+1]

[kroeckx]

Voting +1

[paulidale]

Vote: [+1]

[slontis]

Vote +1

---

From: Pauli @.> Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2022 7:21 AM To: openssl/technical-policies @.> Cc: Shane Lontis @.>; Comment @.> Subject: [External] : Re: [openssl/technical-policies] Revise testing policy with labels (PR #57)

Vote: [+1]

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/openssl/technical-policies/pull/57*issuecomment-1306209082__;Iw!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!JZEsOB6_fFLxbduj79hUgn6xvEQpeLd9CKR7TSI9NOcaTCsjeAerbHftF6dsRyVbN2KIiElZko0ybfPodKsHAqgFBQ$, or unsubscribehttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJUSG6SEU35J2GIH7GI6K63WHFXE7ANCNFSM6AAAAAARKI3IBU__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!JZEsOB6_fFLxbduj79hUgn6xvEQpeLd9CKR7TSI9NOcaTCsjeAerbHftF6dsRyVbN2KIiElZko0ybfPodKtlnDjDLw$. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

[beldmit]

Vote: [+1]

[mspncp]

Vote: [+1]

[mspncp]

(Side Note: @hlandau it would be nice if you could follow the current coloring practice for the labels, i.e., reuse the existing red color for the hold: tests needed label (the hex value appears and can be copy&pasted when you 'edit' one of the existing labels) and choose a new, easily distinguishable color of your liking for the new tests: * labels.)

[hlandau]

(Side Note: @hlandau it would be nice if you could follow the current coloring practice for the labels, i.e., reuse the existing red color for the hold: tests needed label (the hex value appears and can be copy&pasted when you 'edit' one of the existing labels) and choose a new, easily distinguishable color of your liking for the new tests: * labels.)

Agreed, this is my plan: red for the hold, something visually distinct for the other test labels.

[hlandau]

Since the outcome of the vote is now a foregone conclusion, this vote can now be closed.

topic: Approve the proposed test labelling policy (technical-policies#57)
Proposed by Hugo Landau
Public: yes
opened: 2022-11-07
closed: 2022-11-10
accepted:  yes  (for: 8, against: 0, abstained: 1, not voted: 2)

  Dmitry     [+1]
  Matt       [+1]
  Pauli      [+1]
  Tim        [ 0]
  Hugo       [+1]
  Richard    [  ]
  Shane      [+1]
  Tomas      [+1]
  Kurt       [+1]
  Matthias   [+1]
  Nicola     [  ]

[romen]

Vote: [+0]

[t8m]

I've immediately realized that we could avoid some labeling pollution by not requiring the test: exempted label on PRs that are just triaged: documentation or triaged: cleanup or triaged: design or maybe even triaged: refactor.