Closed Gijs-Koot closed 10 years ago
My suggestion would be to hardcode the URL to the static file. I'm not sure if static data that isn't available anywhere online should be incorporated in the API, although this bars the platform from being used as a primary source of data, rather than just as a meta-index.
Yes. It should be Online. Open Culture Data can host a copy, with a reference to the original location of disclosure. We could even register mulitple sites for the data in the harvester. ['statis.ocd.nl',['dropbox.com/employeeX', 'etc']
Currently I can think of two situations were we would have to deal with 'static files':
In case of situation one, I think we should follow @bartdegoede's suggestion: just include the URL to the static file (with the appropriate mime type prefix).
In case of situation two, I think @ajslaghu's suggestion to let OCD host a publicly accessible copy makes sense. When a new datasource is submitted for review, the submitter will have to discuss with the reviewer how the data is transferred to the OCD servers. This process could of course also be automated, if it turns out that many institution provide their data in such a way. Let's hope that this is not the case :smile:.
@Gijs-Koot, do you already have a concrete example of dataset where only static file(s) are provided?
+1 on @justinvw his suggested solutions, for both scenarios.
We now use http://static.opencultuurdata.nl for hosting the files discussed in this issue. For an example, have a look at the Centraal Museum Utrecht dataset.
If the records are received from a static file, it is unclear how
on an
Item
should be implemented.