Open jidanni opened 2 years ago
The suggested organization would require osmlab/editor-layer-index#136.
For now please move CyclOSM down to my suggested position.
iD doesn’t special-case specific layers to put them in specific locations, other than None and Custom (which are built-in options rather than layers loaded from ELI).
Looking at where the alphabet breaks order, I detect three groups above. Hmm, so apparently CyclOSM needs to be renamed O-CyclOSM through Z-CyclOSM, as a hack, to get it to group properly with the non-image layers!
Oh huh, I never noticed that it does the same in the U.S. with “National Agricultural Imagery Program” appearing between “Stamen Terrain” and “U.S. Forest Service roads”. Looks like it’s actually sorted first in descending order by coverage area, then in ascending order by name:
It’s a bit unfortunate that the first sort is in descending order, because it shifts the local sources down to where users are less likely to notice them. I guess the expectation is that good local sources are already marked as best
in ELI, but that’s a tricky decision because “best” can mean many things: osmlab/editor-layer-index#130.
Also
So maybe they should be real low in the list.
I like the idea of grouping the available layers in types (map renderings, remote sensing/imagery), and maybe even allow for the list to be rearranged by drag+drop to your preference. 🤷🏻‍♂️
I actually was thinking of giving titles to each of the groups I made within the horizontal bars: Imagery, Maps, Local sources, etc.
I think as a start, we could at least sort by the imagery's ELI category
which would be osmbasedmap
for cyclosm for example.
Cool, I hadn’t realized osmlab/editor-layer-index#733 introduced a category system. I guess osmlab/editor-layer-index#136 is just tracking a follow-on discussion about a specific categorization issue.
Just to say that I agree with this - I've misclicked on CyclOSM a number of times since it was moved to 2nd in the list!
I made a similar suggestion years ago when the layers more than 20 years old were removed from iD, of having a dropdown where for example historic layers could be hidden rather than removed altogether.
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/3453#issuecomment-258199010
Yes, please put all the satellite maps together
Description
Currently we see:
Backgrounds
Better would be:
Backgrounds
Maxar Premium Imagery
Stamen Terrain
Taiwan e-Map Open Data