Open pietervdvn opened 4 months ago
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11101655659 is an excellent example: the changeset comment even states "added a single picnic table" (but it actually has a picnic area added)
I agree this is confusing and we should make it better.
Some links and data
https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/blob/main/data/presets/leisure/picnic_table.json
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpicnic_table
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/leisure%3Dpicnic_table#overview Geometry | Count |
---|---|
Total | 327āÆ511 |
Node | 326āÆ994 |
Way | 504 |
Relation | 13 |
https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/blob/main/data/presets/tourism/picnic_site.json
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dpicnic_site
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/tourism%3Dpicnic_site#overview geometry | count |
---|---|
totalĀ | 155.474 |
nodeĀ | 129.810 |
lineĀ | 25.300 |
relationĀ | 364 |
What could we do?
maybe someone can create a better icon for the picnic site? Maybe with a fire next to the table?
Or with multiple tables? But it would be hard to fit given icon size.
Describe the bug
When someone wants to add a picnic table, they create a new point and then search 'picnic'. The first option is a
picnic area
which has a picnic table icon. Many people take this, even though it is incorrect and they should take the second option:Expected behavior
It would be better to have picnic table on top or maybe drop picnic area all together from the node presets.