Closed schuyler1d closed 6 years ago
lets talk it through on today's call!
Wouldn't typically you put the link you're sharing in twitter directly in the text? Same with email? But Facebook makes sense I suppose, since that's a separate field.
@j-ro Yes, it will often be in the text, but for various purposes, a system (backend or frontend) may need the pure url:
As you say, for facebook, it's a separate field.
@jimshare Jim can you weigh in here? we want to hear what shareprogress has to say before we move forward!
Agree with @schuyler1d here -- sometimes people may put their link directly in the Twitter text, but it's often appended separately (Twitter in fact now uses a separate share parameter for link, rather than asking people to encode it directly in the Twitter message). And we do use separate links (some shortened, some not) for sharing through the ShareProgress toolbox, so it does differ by share method.
Looking good, PLEASE REVIEW, proposal to be approved in Jan
looks good here from a quick review today!
Both because twitter benefits from short urls, and because a system may want to track sharing on different platforms separately,
share_url
may differ by the context.I tihnk it's acceptable for implementations to use only the root
share_url
but for those that are share_option-aware, it would be good to standardize an option.