coderabbitai[bot]
commented
1 week ago Walkthrough
The changes in this pull request involve significant modifications to the components.vue, layout.vue, and reset.less files. In components.vue, the template structure has been updated with a new ID for a scrollable area, affecting scrolling behavior and layout. In layout.vue, enhancements include new properties for the tiny-tree-menu, improved routing methods, and refined filtering logic. Additionally, reset.less introduces new styles for popper components, enhancing visual consistency. These changes collectively aim to improve user navigation and the overall responsiveness of the documentation interface.
Changes
| File Path | Change Summary |
|---|---|
| examples/sites/src/views/components.vue | - Added id="doc-layout-scoller" to <div class="docs-content">.- Updated references from doc-layout to doc-layout-scoller in JavaScript functions.- Moved footer to be a sibling of the main content div. |
| examples/sites/src/views/layout/layout.vue | - Introduced tiny-tree-menu with new properties for enhanced interaction.- Updated clickMenu, getMenuLink, and searchMenu methods.- Added collapseChange method for menu state management.- Adjusted CSS styles for layout responsiveness. |
| packages/theme/src/base/reset.less | - Added styles for .tiny-popper with margin adjustments.- Consolidated styles for popper components with arrows, defining their appearance and positioning. |
Possibly related PRs
- #2266: Addresses style issues with document anchors, related to scrolling behavior in
components.vue. - #2391: Fixes demo anchor positions, directly relating to improvements in
components.vuefor better user experience. - #2485: Adds a common footer and optimizes demo scrolling, complementing layout adjustments in
components.vue.
Suggested reviewers
- zzcr
- kagol
🐇 In a world of docs and scrolls,
A rabbit hops where knowledge rolls.
With menus that dance and layouts that gleam,
Navigation's a breeze, like a sweet dream.
So let’s celebrate with a joyful cheer,
For changes that make our path so clear! 🐰✨
📜 Recent review details
**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL**📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 608167ce2ebfece55f2556838a6a860ea22fa82a and 09aac2b790a8132df4cbbec407bddcfc0231949d.📒 Files selected for processing (1)
* `packages/theme/src/base/reset.less` (1 hunks)🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/theme/src/base/reset.less (3)
`180-197`: **LGTM! Consistent margin handling for poppers without arrows.** The implementation provides a uniform 4px margin for all placement directions, which helps maintain visual consistency across different components (select, userlink, roles, dept). --- Line range hint `203-248`: **LGTM! Improved arrow implementation with better visual control.** The switch from border-based to div-based arrows is a good improvement: - Better control over arrow dimensions and appearance - Consistent positioning across different placements - Clear z-index handling to prevent overlay issues The implementation aligns well with the PR objective of fixing popper layer separation during scrolling. --- `199-202`: **Verify browser compatibility for the :has() selector.** While consolidating styles is good for maintainability, the `:has()` selector is relatively new and might not be supported in all browsers. Consider adding a fallback for browsers that don't support `:has()`: ```diff .tiny-popconfirm-popover:has(.popper__arrow), .tiny-popper:has(.popper__arrow), .tiny-tooltip__popper:has(.popper__arrow) { + /* Fallback for browsers that don't support :has() */ +} + +/* Separate selectors as fallback */ +.tiny-popconfirm-popover .popper__arrow, +.tiny-popper .popper__arrow, +.tiny-tooltip__popper .popper__arrow { /* Same styles as above */ } ```✅ Verification successful
**Browser compatibility concerns with :has() are valid, but the implementation is acceptable** The usage of `:has()` selector is part of a progressive enhancement strategy: - The styles only affect the visual appearance of popper arrows (tooltips, popconfirms) - The base functionality remains intact even without `:has()` support - The component will still work, just with slightly different spacing/appearance - Modern enterprise browsers (Chrome, Edge, Safari) support `:has()` The codebase shows a pattern of handling compatibility issues where needed (e.g., `@supports` for MS Edge), suggesting browser support is considered when critical.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check if there are any browser compatibility fallbacks in the codebase # Test: Look for any CSS fallback patterns or polyfills for :has() rg -i "has\(\)" "packages/theme" -A 5 -B 5 ``` Length of output: 42 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Let's check the entire reset.less file to understand the context better cat packages/theme/src/base/reset.less # Also check for any browser compatibility related configurations or comments rg -i "browser|compat|support" packages/theme ``` Length of output: 4533Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
github-actions[bot]
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
修复弹出层分离的问题。 调整组件页面的滚动元素， 改为 #doc-layout-scroller
以后整改时，可以通过 $refs 去访问 #doc-layout-scroller元素了
统一tiny-popper的样式
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Style