coderabbitai[bot]
commented
2 days ago Walkthrough
The changes in this pull request focus on enhancing the calendar-view component across several files. The height property type has been modified to allow both string and number values, improving flexibility. Additionally, the CSS for the calendar view has been updated to include an overflow: auto; property, enabling scrolling for overflowing content. The Vue component's template has also been adjusted to conditionally apply styles based on the height property type, streamlining the rendering logic.
Changes
| File Path | Change Summary |
|---|---|
| examples/sites/demos/apis/calendar-view.js | Updated height property type from string to string | number. |
| packages/theme/src/calendar-view/index.less | Added overflow: auto; to the main calendar view class for scrolling when content overflows. |
| packages/vue/src/calendar-view/src/index.ts | Changed height property type in calendarViewProps from String to [String, Number]. |
| packages/vue/src/calendar-view/src/pc.vue | Adjusted template to conditionally apply height styles based on height prop type; cleaned up rendering logic. |
Possibly related PRs
- #2297: This PR refactors the theme variables related to the calendar view component, which is directly connected to the changes made in the main PR regarding the
calendar-viewcomponent's properties. - #2323: Similar to #2297, this PR also focuses on refactoring the theme variables for the calendar component, indicating a strong relationship with the changes in the main PR.
- #2442: This PR addresses bugs related to the month-table component, which is part of the date-picker functionality, linking it to the changes in the main PR that involve the calendar view and its properties.
- #2481: This PR optimizes the demo and modifies styles for the time-range component, which is relevant to the calendar view changes in the main PR as they both deal with date and time selection components.
Suggested reviewers
- zzcr
🐇 In the garden where the calendars grow,
A height change here, a style change there, oh!
With overflow set, the content can scroll,
Flexibility blooms, making it all whole.
Hopping through code, we make it just right,
Our calendar's ready, oh what a delight! 🌼
📜 Recent review details
**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL**📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6abbcdf023a1eb76bccd16d44e995dbdc9536640 and 68f1db2d591c111be7e580bc2804c9b6ac3de2d9.📒 Files selected for processing (1)
* `examples/sites/demos/pc/app/calendar-view/calendar-disabled-day.spec.ts` (1 hunks)🔇 Additional comments (2)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/calendar-view/calendar-disabled-day.spec.ts (2)
`9-11`: **LGTM: Assertions are correctly maintained** The assertions checking for disabled states and date classes remain appropriate and aligned with the component's expected behavior. --- `6-8`: **Verify the robustness of the new day selectors** While the selector changes appear to fix the immediate issue, using nth-based selectors might be fragile if the calendar's DOM structure changes. Consider using more robust selectors that are less dependent on element order. Here's a script to verify the uniqueness and stability of the day selectors: Consider refactoring to use more specific selectors: ```diff - const day10 = page.getByText('10').nth(1) - const day14 = page.getByText('14').nth(1) - const day15 = page.getByText('15').nth(2) + // Add data-testid attributes to calendar days in the component + const day10 = page.getByTestId('calendar-day-10') + const day14 = page.getByTestId('calendar-day-14') + const day15 = page.getByTestId('calendar-day-15') ```✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the calendar day rendering and test patterns to better assess the situation. --- Let me check the calendar component implementation to understand the day rendering structure better. --- Let me try one final check focusing on the specific calendar-disabled-day implementation and its test. --- Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response: **The nth-based selectors are appropriate for this calendar implementation** The calendar component's implementation and test patterns reveal that: 1. The component uses a disabled function that affects all dates before the 15th, which explains why we need specific nth selectors for dates 10, 14, and 15 2. Other calendar tests in the same directory also consistently use nth selectors for date selection 3. The selector changes align with the component's rendering logic where: - Dates before 15 are disabled (matching the disabled function implementation) - Multiple instances of the same date can appear due to the calendar grid structure The nth-based selectors are currently the most reliable way to target specific dates in this calendar implementation, as: - The dates appear multiple times due to the calendar's month-view structure - The component doesn't expose more specific attributes for testing - Other calendar tests in the codebase follow the same pattern🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential selector ambiguity in calendar-view tests # Search for similar test files that might be affected by this change echo "Checking for related test files..." rg -l "getByText\(('|\")(?:10|14|15)('|\")\)\.nth\(" --type ts # Look for the calendar day rendering logic echo "Checking calendar day rendering implementation..." ast-grep --pattern 'render() { $$$ return ( $$$
$$$
{/* Look for day rendering logic */}
$$$
)
}'
```
Length of output: 604
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation and usage patterns in related files
# Look at the calendar-disabled-day test implementation
echo "Calendar disabled day test implementation:"
cat examples/sites/demos/pc/app/calendar-view/calendar-disabled-day.spec.ts
# Check other test files using similar selectors
echo -e "\nRelated test implementations:"
rg -A 5 "getByText\(('|\")(?:10|14|15)('|\")\)\.nth\(" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/condition-form.spec.ts examples/sites/demos/pc/app/date-picker/default-value.spec.ts
# Look for calendar day rendering patterns
echo -e "\nCalendar day rendering patterns:"
rg -A 10 "class=\"tiny-calendar-date\"" --type-add 'vue:*.{vue,tsx}' --type vue
```
Length of output: 2186
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for calendar component implementation
echo "Searching for calendar component files:"
fd -e vue -e tsx calendar
# Check the implementation of calendar days
echo -e "\nChecking calendar day implementation:"
rg -A 10 "class.*?(?:date|calendar-date|calendar-cell)" --type vue --type tsx
# Look for any data-testid usage in the codebase
echo -e "\nChecking existing data-testid patterns:"
rg "data-testid" --type vue --type tsx --type ts
```
Length of output: 2612
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Check the specific calendar disabled day implementation and test
echo "Calendar disabled day component:"
cat examples/sites/demos/pc/app/calendar-view/calendar-disabled-day.vue
echo -e "\nChecking for similar nth selector patterns in other calendar tests:"
rg "nth\(" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/calendar-view/*.spec.ts
# Check if there are any existing test utilities or helper functions
echo -e "\nChecking for test utilities:"
fd -e ts "test-utils" "helpers"
```
Length of output: 3274
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
…ght value
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
heightproperty in the calendar view component, now accepting both string and numeric values.