Closed austinlparker closed 5 years ago
So I think this is a good addition overall - although some feedback given to the Binary
stuff in Java can be applied here, regarding Stream
having members that are not related to the current scenario (CanRead
, CanWrite
, CopyTo
, etc).
I'd personally be up for adding this with a note on it being experimental, so people know it could change in the next versions (which actually happened to the Java side, when we changed it from using ByteBuffer
to the `Binary wrapper ;) )
I was thinking about that, but I'm also not entirely sure how many of the problems that people ran into on Java are going to be a problem here. I like the experimental idea though.
This adds a builtin Binary Propagator format for consumers of the API.