Closed pierrelesesvre closed 8 years ago
Only DTZ is a valid IATA code, which has indeed recently been assigned to the Dortmund railway station. The other three codes are not valid, and have not been for at least the last five years. DTZ is not in Geonames right now. Do not hesitate to add it.
To me, DTZ looks more like a real estate agent company which happens to be hosted in LGG airport.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Denis Arnaud notifications@github.com wrote:
Closed #22 https://github.com/opentraveldata/geobases/issues/22.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/opentraveldata/geobases/issues/22#event-593418274
Sorry, I wrote that from my mail client, before I received Denis' answer. I did not mean to contradict his statement. You should read what I wrote as an explanation to to why you thought DTZ was the IATA code for Liège.
The Dortmund railway station has been added within Geonames: http://www.geonames.org/11101852
Hello,
I am using GeoBases on MIDT data (flights bookings), and I found that the following IATA codes do not exist in optd_por_public.csv: DTZ, BYZ, GIJ, HFH
I am not sure whether they really exists or whether they are just false data.
Can you update this .csv file, if needed?
Best regards, Pierre