Closed roll closed 9 years ago
Are these Participants then further related to the participant descriptions (which i believe are in there somewhere)? Are you saying that by summing on the m2m relation you can get a count?
I'll provide some ideas a little bit later on it.
It looks like the Cochrane database doesn't have a participant count or I can't find it. I see only data like this - Trial XXX use males and females
(thru m2m table).
@danfowler would you like to take a look on it?
@roll @pwalsh tblStudy.UDef1 contains the number of randomized participants in a trial. It doesn't look like you can sum the participant descriptions to get a count per study; you will just get a count of types of participants.
Great! Thanks.
@pwalsh
Are you OK (from the app side) if we start from this fields about participants:
It looks like Cochrane database hasn't any other usefull data and current version of the schema syncs with your okfn/opentrials-prototype#7 pictures
yes, looks good to me.
Background As a part of the #2 issue we have to discuss with @danfowler and the team some parts of the ideal data model. It's a subtask named "Analyze the data we have, in comparison to the ideal model".
Topic
As mentioned in okfn/opentrials-prototype#7 we want to have number of participants, age range and sex. The Cochrane database handles it as having
Participant
entity with types of participants and m2m relation withTrial
entity:It doesn't look as the best way to organize this data (where is a number of participants?).
Thoughts
Trial
entity?See also - https://github.com/okfn/opentrials-cochrane-schizophrenia-data/wiki