Closed ryanpeterson08 closed 2 years ago
Or maybe we create a new OSM tag that tells routing engines like OTP "do not route".
Grant mentions this tagging scheme: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sac_scale, but the lowest level of this scale is still nothing we'd want to route folks on. BTW, the only tags that OTP recognizes now that affect walking are access=no and foot=no, but it wouldn't be accurate to add either of these to OSM to the path in question.
OTP also already takes path slope into account. It could just be that we haven't set the limit/cost for steep paths high enough.
I'd also like to see an entire set of more intelligent walk weighting combined with the preferences triangle. A surprising number of people use my OTP instance for walk planning, but are surprised when it advises them to use a highway instead of a greenway or sidewalk. Today, OTP just chooses the best route which is often the shortest but not a way that many pedestrians would choose.
This issue is stale because it has been open 90 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 30 days
This is coming to OTP2 in #4328.
Have had cases where our trip planner gives a walking route that is a quicker route, but the route is a narrow/steep hiking path that some would probably rather avoid. Could be a good idea to have a walking weight system similar to the biking weights for people who want to take safer routes.