gusaus
commented
6 years ago Based on a variety a factors, I'd like to suggest the next meeting be more of a working session where we can close out any outstanding issues and reach consensus on how to approach the next phase.
Open Ulmus: Phase I
Stuff needed to review, evaluate, and complete before moving on
- [ ] Review Open Ulmus service scope and model to sustain https://github.com/openulmus/openulmus.org/issues/58
- [ ] Program team is only responsible for managing and sustaining the program
- [ ] Services (producing classes, providing hosted instances, and even building/maintaining the next phase of Open Ulmus https://github.com/openulmus/openulmus.org/issues/1#issuecomment-369738844) would be done on behalf of Open Learning Labs and other partners https://github.com/openlearninglabs/administration/issues/1
- [ ] Review and complete outstanding post-launch cleanup tasks https://github.com/openulmus/openulmus.org/issues/34
Open Ulmus: Phase II
- [ ] Review and evaluate this suggested path forward https://github.com/openulmus/openulmus.org/issues/1#issuecomment-369738844
Agenda
1. Short Role Call
2. Active Tasks
3. Resources Page
More of an ELMS:LN type issue, but definitely something to follow-up on. See #45 (Will nix this 'standing' issue/task once we have a bulk-resource other than "Go see btopro's YouTube".)
4. Wrap-Up
[ ] a. Wrap-Up Question: Who do you feel a solid competitor for OpenUlmus is?
PM in Slack if there are any other Agenda items you'd like to add.