Closed sharkcow closed 2 weeks ago
Seems like this PR undid #920 . Was that intentional?
No, that must be my mistake... probably I didn't rebase correctly before submitting the PR. Sorry about that, but I'm sure Michael can fix it? ;-)
Your rebase was correct, you had the change in your tree and then exchanged the corresponding lines by your new implementation, see the diff:
This looks totally intentional. If it wasn't, please merge your intended change with the one by @kezarjg and create a new PR.
good for comparing different regular routes as to which is the fastest one :)
this time with better data types and display (thanks to Michael) :D