search

openvex / spec

OpenVEX Specification
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
122 stars 18 forks source link

Published schema for OpenVex #14

Closed garethr closed 1 day ago

garethr commented 1 year ago

The specification is a good human readable document, but it's not machine readable.

It would be useful to have a standalone schema (for instance in JSON Schema) for the specification. This would:

Thoughts?

luhring commented 1 year ago

Great idea!

puerco commented 1 year ago

I have a draft of the schema and context but I have not pr'ed them yet because I'm waiting for the VEX document to get finalized. At least frozen.

dlorenc commented 1 year ago

I have a draft of the schema and context but I have not pr'ed them yet because I'm waiting for the VEX document to get finalized. At least frozen.

Seem safe to PR it at least!

tschmidtb51 commented 1 year ago

Just a word of caution: A schema, even though it's a good start, won't be enough to ensure that OpenVEX documents are valid VEX documents - see the discussion in #19. You might need to check that the encapsulation document has the products listed...

jspeed-meyers commented 1 year ago

@puerco, what happened to the draft of the schema and context? Did you already PR it and it just wasn't linked to this issue? In other words ( 😄 ), has this issue already been addressed and so can be closed?

aamedina commented 11 months ago

Would there be any interest in an RDF model for OpenVEX?

aamedina commented 11 months ago

Here is an experimental OWL ontology with links to SPDX 3 profiles if anyone cares to import it into Protege use the spdx ontologies in the resources/spdx folder https://github.com/aamedina/ssvc/blob/eec287d86e4021ba6b5fe642eed05f987283bdd4/resources/vex/openvex.ttl

puerco commented 11 months ago

@aamedina if there is a need, go for it! We will be updating the spec next week, so it should be based on that revision. Let's chat about it on the community call!