negvet
commented
2 months ago Hmm, it might be semantically a subsection of the user guide.
This is a good suggestion, I followed it. Initially, I assumed that it might be too big, but probably it is fine.
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## releases/1.1.0 #63 +/- ## ================================================== + Coverage 93.65% 94.29% +0.64% ================================================== Files 26 27 +1 Lines 1638 1857 +219 ================================================== + Hits 1534 1751 +217 - Misses 104 106 +2 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/openvinotoolkit/openvino_xai/pull/63/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openvinotoolkit) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [dev-py310](https://app.codecov.io/gh/openvinotoolkit/openvino_xai/pull/63/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openvinotoolkit) | `94.29% <ø> (+0.64%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openvinotoolkit#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.