Closed negvet closed 2 months ago
Did you update presets using metrics or manually checking quality of the saliency maps in #63?
Also, the table of contents for some reason doesn't show the inner structure of XAI overview methods
. Can you check what went wrong there, please?
Did you update presets using metrics or manually checking quality of the saliency maps in https://github.com/openvinotoolkit/openvino_xai/pull/63?
I have not used metrics, just qualitative assessment for now. Quantitative analysis is in TODO list
Also, the table of contents for some reason doesn't show the inner structure of XAI overview methods. Can you check what went wrong there, please?
This is intentional. Do you think we need it? Probably it will be too long, what do you think? May be the main subsections only..
Also, the table of contents for some reason doesn't show the inner structure of XAI overview methods. Can you check what went wrong there, please?
This is intentional. Do you think we need it? Probably it will be too long, what do you think? May be the main subsections only..
Let's make it for inly main subsections: white-box and black box
Let's make it for inly main subsections: white-box and black box
Done
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 94.31%. Comparing base (
a95e871
) to head (7a5a69e
). Report is 1 commits behind head on releases/1.1.0.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
For the reference maps, see https://github.com/openvinotoolkit/openvino_xai/pull/63
Future work: measure metrics