Open jas4711 opened 2 weeks ago
Sorry, I don't think we build libnss_tcb.so
, did you mean libnss_tcb.so.2
?
From one side, libnss_tcb.so.2
behaves like a plugin rather than a regular shared library: it isn't linked with, it's being dlopen'ed instead, so technically speaking it doesn't need a soname.
From another side, adding a soname shouldn't cause any issues to anyone, so if it would make somebody happy, I don't mind adding it.
Good point. I suggest to close this as wontfix
since it looks like a lintian false positive, unless someone can provide better justification for adding the soname. I've seen that others disable the complaint like this, and I will do something similar.
https://salsa.debian.org/glibc-team/libnss-nis/-/blob/master/debian/lintian-overrides
The
libtcb.so
file is built with-Wl,-soname
butlibnss_tcb.so
is not. Is that intentional? Debian's lintian complains about this library, and asks that it is built with a soname. I don't know what the praxis is for NSS modules, but I'm also not sure it hurts. Thoughts? Could you add it?