Closed andrewwhitehead closed 1 year ago
I was approving the changes — not necessarily that it be merged immediately :-).
@blu3beri @genaris @TimoGlastra @dbluhm — are there any other unmerged PRs (such as #105) that we should merge before this final 0.2.8 PR is merged?
That being said, as we are still testing it, it's likely that we'll have some other issues, so we might need to do further fixes anyway.
I would like to get #104 in. If we cannot do this then it would be good for the JS wrapper if we do a 0.2.9 release rather quickly afterwards as our integration into Bifold and finishing up the AFJ 0.4.0 release depends on the migration script.
Yeah if we can get the migration script in, it would then be possible to keep iterating on the js wrapper dev versions while the 0.2.8 binary is already released.
Maybe #105 should be merged first?