The objective of this SIG is to develop and maintain the Digital Wallets and Agents Overview. The overview should provide transparency of the characteristics of wallets and agents in order to allow for an objective comparison and effective decision making on which wallet or agent is applicable for your use case.
When selecting a wallet, it should show up all agents that are compatible with the wallet like "when my wallet supports the EBSI credential profile, show me all agents, that are supporting it". And of course vise versa.
We need to define what compatible means: are we just looking at the credential profiles (since it defines the required resources like key management, credential format, transport protocol) or is just transport protocol enough? I would prefer the profile, since this covers whole compatibility.
At this point we need to explain also to the user, that we haven't actually tested the compatibility (like have both parties implemented the same version to work together), but are just adding the relationships based on the provided data.
When selecting a wallet, it should show up all agents that are compatible with the wallet like "when my wallet supports the EBSI credential profile, show me all agents, that are supporting it". And of course vise versa.
We need to define what compatible means: are we just looking at the credential profiles (since it defines the required resources like key management, credential format, transport protocol) or is just transport protocol enough? I would prefer the profile, since this covers whole compatibility.
At this point we need to explain also to the user, that we haven't actually tested the compatibility (like have both parties implemented the same version to work together), but are just adding the relationships based on the provided data.