No websockets for Balance, Deposit, Withdraw

[ysv]

@martianatwork nice point We will add this in 2.1

[ianeinser]

And also no markets, currencies and market depth.

[martianatwork]

@ysv Looks like we have private WebSocket for deposit_address but it is not documented. I will create a PR with the required changes. Currently im testing Account & Deposit WebSocket.

[ianeinser]

@ysv we suggest that you also add TRANSFER to complete the trio namely DEPOSIT, TRANSFER and WITHDRAW

[martianatwork]

@ianeinser Transfer as in?

[ianeinser]

@martianatwork as in #2023. I suggest that transfer function not be done through management api because the fund is still inside the system.. it is the withdraw which should be done through management api and preferrably with multi-sig

[ianeinser]

@ysv would it be possible to include buy/sell too for ranger to support, then we can do bidirectional websocket connection. Or buy/sell should be provided as RESTful only?

[ianeinser]

would like to get user activities and activities delivered through ranger..

[martianatwork]

@ianeinser I dont think that we need the transfers as WebSocket those are for management and not for user.

For user we just need Deposit, Withdraw, Account (balance, locker, payment address), Order, Trades, Tickers, K line should be enough.

[ianeinser]

@ianeinser I dont think that we need the transfers as WebSocket those are for management and not for user.

For user we just need Deposit, Withdraw, Account (balance, locker, payment address), Order, Trades, Tickers, K line should be enough. @martianatwork what about market depth? it is available in user api

[martianatwork]

@ysv Hey any plans to implement this?

[TheHolyRoger]

No news on this balance websocket feed?

[mnaichuk]

Implemented in Finex